Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: The ill fated HK 1911...what was different?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    District 11
    Posts
    6,345
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)

    The ill fated HK 1911...what was different?

    "lthough few people realize this, the much-talked-about HK 45 was actually born out of an ill-fated HK 1911 program. A number of years ago Ken Hackathorn and I were consultants to Heckler & Koch on developing an enhanced 1911-type pistol. It would have had some excellent features,"

    Vickers' said this in Guns and Ammo. Does anyone have any other details? Somebody who knows him ask please?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Jacksonville, NC
    Posts
    552
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I recall somewhere in the article he says that the HK 1911 "would price it's way out of the market" or words to that effect. A battleworthy 1911 (for complete consistency over a large production run) is at least a moderately expensive proposition. The tack on the fact that HK stuff is always pricey. Also HK is probably fat on military contracts and doesn't see the need to build something completely new for them that would be expensive to produce and export and appeal to a relatively small corner of the gun market.

    This is all speculation of course.
    Don't forget to show my head to the people. It's well worth seeing.
    -Georges Danton

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    344
    Feedback Score
    0
    P7,

    Larry said it "never made it's way off the paper." (paraphrased)
    The only things he mentions at the course, that I remember was it was to have a external extractor, the ejector was held in a different manner and a perhaps a integral plunger tube...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    District 11
    Posts
    6,345
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    Too bad that didn't come off the drawing board. It would have been nice to see what H&K could do with old slabby.
    Let those who are fond of blaming and finding fault, while they sit safely at home, ask, ‘Why did you not do thus and so?’I wish they were on this voyage; I well believe that another voyage of a different kind awaits them.”

    Christopher Columbus

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    254
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Edwards View Post
    P7,

    ..... I remember was it was to have an external extractor, the ejector was held in a different manner and a perhaps a integral plunger tube...
    Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't the external extractors the ones that were causing issues on some of the Kimber 1911s or do I have it the other way around and the problem being the internal extractors?
    "Most standards are set low to accomodate the bottom feeders of life who lack the personal pride, motivation and determination to rise above the rest." - Paul Howe

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    WY
    Posts
    887
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Yeah, all the current external extractors suck that are available. Hilton Yam has been working on one for a while that will work like a champ when he is satisfied with the results.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    554
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    I was under the impression that, while the Kimber External Extractor was a disaster and the Sig GSR wasnt MUCH better, the Smith and Wesson external extractor has been pretty successful...

    From what I read and hear the S&W1911 and S&W1911PD series of guns are all experiencing a wide range of success and both, if I am not mistaken, feature an external extractor...(in fact, I dont seem to have read any more or less complaints about the S&W 1911s than I do about any of their other comprable counterparts....ie springfields, the basic colts, kimbers, etc....)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Free Pa.
    Posts
    802
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by trio View Post
    I was under the impression that, while the Kimber External Extractor was a disaster and the Sig GSR wasnt MUCH better, the Smith and Wesson external extractor has been pretty successful...

    From what I read and hear the S&W1911 and S&W1911PD series of guns are all experiencing a wide range of success and both, if I am not mistaken, feature an external extractor...(in fact, I dont seem to have read any more or less complaints about the S&W 1911s than I do about any of their other comprable counterparts....ie springfields, the basic colts, kimbers, etc....)

    Kimber's extractor was an unmitigated disaster and Smith and Wesson hasn't had any problems with theirs.

    Sig had problems in the beginning but there is a story behind their problems. They were buying their external extractors from Wilson Combat who in turn were outsourcing them from a third party. Shortly before the GSR first came out the company making the part for Wilson changed the specs of the extractor without telling Wilson or Sig. That was the genesis of their issues. Sig hired George Smith at EGW to redesign and produce the new external extractor and since then they have been rock solid.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    WY
    Posts
    887
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I have seen firsthand 3 SW1911s experience extraction problems that could not be fixed. One got a new Caspian slide, 2 went back to Smith. One of those worked well enough and the other was sold. That's enough for me not to trust them.

    Only 3 is not too bad, though. You hear less about SW 1911s than others. If I went to school with all the time I spent fixing Kimber Series II guns I'd be doing heart transplants right now instead.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,122
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Striker5 View Post
    I recall somewhere in the article he says that the HK 1911 "would price it's way out of the market" or words to that effect.
    But I bet people would have gone nuts over the $52 rust prone 8 shot mags.
    NOT in training for combat deployment.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •