Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 81

Thread: Unfortunate Recent Infestation of "Those Guys"

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    4,829
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    It would seem to me that the definition of "those guys" would necessarily include looking at more experienced people, (including people who made a profession of arms for significant parts of their life and who now make a profession of training others to arms) that their observations after having put millions of rounds downrange and having supervised millions more are essentially no better than a guy with a couple of rifles and a lifetime experience of a couple of thousand rounds...none of them even in a demanding training environment.

    ...or perhaps taking a couple of training courses and then asking how exactly a Marine or SF soldier is better prepared for hazardous duty than you are, as if the training courses puts someone on the same footing as somebody who made it into a SEAL team....

    Meaning that if you steer clear of such nonsense you are probably not within the category of "those guys".

    That's not really elitist in my opinion. Nobody will look down their nose at someone who doesn't know and treat them as unworthy gutter trash because they don't know what color the boathouse is at Hereford, or because they haven't put 1,000 hours of training in yet. Things get tricky when someone who doesn't know behaves as though they DO know, and stridently insists that they in fact DO know and does so in a combative and disrespectful way.

    Granted I don't read every thread on this site, but in every thread I have seen I have yet to see someone seeking knowledge and understanding be mistreated for doing so. Quite the opposite, in fact. Problems only happen when somebody goes beyond the limitations of their knowledge and the limitations of the environment they are in.

    As an example, I was recently contacted by a former Marine who wanted to get into contracting work. He saw that I posted fairly often on another site in threads mentioning contractors and asked if I had any contacts or advice for him. I explained to him that I was an inferior source of information and pointed him to places where he could get in contact with people who actually know what they are talking about. In the threads he referenced, I seemed to be one of the smarter guys in the room because I was responding to the black helicopter and tinfoil hat crowd with some actual facts and a tiny bit of firsthand information. The reality is that I *was* one of the smarter guys in the room, but only because that was a particularly stupid room. It was sort of like being one of the smarter kids in a special ed class...not really all that challenging and certainly nothing to write home about.

    The same thing is true here. There is a very deep pool of knowledge here and one would do well to recognize that and behave accordingly. I am better informed on the topic of self defense, training, and fighting than your average General Discussion poster on TOS.....but on this site I'm definitely licking the windows on the short bus. I happily embrace that reality because it means that I have the opportunity to learn here as opposed to other places where one is constantly bombarded by bad info.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rhino View Post
    I don't know if I am one of "those guys" or not. Probably some here would categorize me that way and some not so much.

    If I may interject an opinion, I'm not 100% comfortable with the deliberate stratification happening here. I don't want to antagonize anyone, but the term "elitist" is what first came to my mind. I know some of my own perceptions are coloring assessment, but I feel the urge to be candid about this issue.

    While I see the desire to have a set of forums where the less constructive contributions are minimized is certainly valid, some of the commentary directed toward those people and/or their messages is just as bad (in my opinion) as the objectionable comments made by those who are the objects of the criticism (and often pillory). It reminds me of people who actively hate and discriminate against people whom they label racists.

    This set of forums is clearly private property and the owner(s) may operate it as he/she sees fit. Rules are what they are and I do my best to adhere to them, but I hope I can express my thoughts without undue reprisal.
    M4C is a training/technical oriented forum geared toward the professional shooter or defense minded civy.

    The people that Thekatar is referring to, are the ones that believe training is a foolish waste of time and money, want only the cheapest gear and call everyone else "fools" for buying quality. These people are also the ones that look at Pat Rogers or LAV comments and or reviews and think they know more than they do.

    While these people are of course free to comment and give their .02, they need to realize that they are in the minority on this forum.


    C4

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    206
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rhino View Post
    I don't want to antagonize anyone, but the term "elitist" is what first came to my mind.
    You could probably add "Legend in his/her own mind". There are folks like that...

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,148
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rhino View Post
    I don't know if I am one of "those guys" or not. Probably some here would categorize me that way and some not so much.

    If I may interject an opinion, I'm not 100% comfortable with the deliberate stratification happening here. I don't want to antagonize anyone, but the term "elitist" is what first came to my mind. I know some of my own perceptions are coloring assessment, but I feel the urge to be candid about this issue.

    While I see the desire to have a set of forums where the less constructive contributions are minimized is certainly valid, some of the commentary directed toward those people and/or their messages is just as bad (in my opinion) as the objectionable comments made by those who are the objects of the criticism (and often pillory). It reminds me of people who actively hate and discriminate against people whom they label racists.

    This set of forums is clearly private property and the owner(s) may operate it as he/she sees fit. Rules are what they are and I do my best to adhere to them, but I hope I can express my thoughts without undue reprisal.
    I both agree and disagree. No, I don't think we want to exclude anyone, but yes, I think that some people would be happier elsewhere. Everyone has one or two places on the web where they actually fit and feel comfortable. This one may not be it for everyone.

    Myself, I found that I was moving past the level of discussion on the bubblegum forums and losing patience for the high BS:good info ratio. At the same time, 10-8forums are too strict for someone of my personality. I find M4C to be a good balance between the two. Most of the people we're referring to as "those guys" would be happier on the bubblegum forums. I wouldn't personally be sorry to see them go.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    789
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    I both agree and disagree. No, I don't think we want to exclude anyone, but yes, I think that some people would be happier elsewhere. Everyone has one or two places on the web where they actually fit and feel comfortable. This one may not be it for everyone.
    That is an excellent point and a really good way to state it. Thank you!

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    0
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I think rhino has a valid point.

    While I certainly agree M4C needs to be watched constantly to keep the content/standards high we also have to be very understanding & accommodating to the new members. Not everybody starts out as high speed as you guys.

    Last time I checked very few are actually issued a black ninja suit on this forum. Always remember “Those Guys” were you 2,3,5,10, 20 or so years ago.

    Plus the Internet already has several know-it-all forums. Some think they get their qualifications because of forum post count (moronic), the “cool factor” of the guns they own, wearing a badge (LE), or being active duty mil. None of these actually proves you know shit depending on your training level, years in service, units attached, etc. All this gets you in my opinion is the 1st impression benefit of the doubt, but most end up not deserving it.

    Let’s all try to be humble, stay in our lane, and be understanding of others point of view. It will make M4C a lot nicer place to hang out.
    Paul A. Hotaling
    Alias Training & Security Services, LLC
    Paul@aliastraining.com
    757-215-1959 (Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM)
    757-985-9586 (After Hours)
    www.aliastraining.com


  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    5,963
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by VA_Dinger View Post
    Let’s all try to be humble, stay in our lane, and understanding. It will make M4C a lot nicer place to hang out.
    You've gone soft!

    Grant, I need a replacement to play "Attila the Hun" to my "Satan", this one is all broken.....

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    789
    Feedback Score
    0
    I think I need my own lane. Make it wide (to match me). That way I won't bump into anyone, nor will I get run over!

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    0
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SHIVAN View Post
    You've gone soft!

    Grant, I need a replacement to play "Attila the Hun" to my "Satan", this one is all broken.....


    Your evil.
    Paul A. Hotaling
    Alias Training & Security Services, LLC
    Paul@aliastraining.com
    757-215-1959 (Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM)
    757-985-9586 (After Hours)
    www.aliastraining.com


  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,028
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    To me, being "That Guy" is all about attitude - a crappy one.

    I look at this forum as a refuge from all of the other nonsense out there. I have a very low tolerance for B.S. and I know a lot of other guys here feel the same way.

    Suggesting "elitism" implies that you are discriminated against or looked down upon because of your youth, low post count, limited skillset, lack of experience or mediocre shooting ability.

    All of that would be incorrect. Dinger said to be "humble" and to "stay in your lane" - he is right; that is the essence of it. It has to do with having a good attitude, with reading more than posting, and with respecting the advice and opinions of Industry Professionals.

    If you feel the need to ask if you are "That Guy" then you probably already know the answer. Here is a quote from the M4C Mission Statement:

    In order to maintain a site that is an effective database of good information, it is best to post information that you have first hand knowledge of. If you are repeating information that you have been told or have read from another poster, it is best to disclose that in the opening of the post.

    Differences in opinion are quite common amongst the firearms industry, as there are few absolutes in this industry. And as a result, debates over preferences are common. We hope you use this forum to share and exchange ideas and not to win arguments. It is the bigger man that agrees to disagree without being disagreeable.

Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •