Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 300 AAC BLACKOUT questions

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    91
    Feedback Score
    0

    300 AAC BLACKOUT questions

    I was looking at the 300 AAC Blackout and wanted to get some input from people here. I'm not so concerned about the subsonic stuff because I can't run suppressed.

    It looks like it has similar ballistics to 7.62x39 correct? I'm assuming that it wouldn't be nearly as flat shooting as 5.56\6.8 at longer ranges.

    I can see the utility for people that have to run super-quiet suppressed because they can just swap ammo and go from a heavy slow cartridge to a lighter faster cardtridge without changing weapons; but I wondered if it brought anything to the table as far as ballistics, recoil and follow up, especially for SBRs.

    Any 300 Whisper\Fireball\300-221 users input would be appreciated as it's nearly the same thing right?

    edit: Sorry I'm not sure which forum this should go in....
    Last edited by wileecoyote; 10-20-10 at 16:41.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    13,151
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by wileecoyote View Post

    It looks like it has similar ballistics to 7.62x39 correct?

    I'm assuming that it wouldn't be nearly as flat shooting as 5.56\6.8 at longer ranges.

    Any 300 Whisper\Fireball\300-221 users input would be appreciated as it's nearly the same thing right?
    Correct on all.
    Stick


    Board policy mandates I state that I shoot for BCM. I have also done work for 200 or so manufacturers within the firearm community. I am prior service, a full time LEO, firearm instructor, armorer, TL, martial arts instructor, and all around good guy.

    I also shoot and write for various publications. Let me know if you know cool secrets or have toys worthy of an article...


    Flickr Tumblr Facebook Instagram RECOILMAGAZINE OFF GRID RECOIL WEB

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    91
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks Stickman! Love your pics btw.

    Any idea on recoil for the supersonic loads? Where does it fall in the 5.56\6.8\7.62 spectrum?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    S. FL.
    Posts
    39
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I'm also interested in hearing about how recoil is perceived compared to 5.56. The small powder charge leads me to believe recoil will be very similar to 5.56, but I'd like some input from someone with first hand knowledge.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,705
    Feedback Score
    0
    http://www.handloads.com/calc/recoil.asp

    For the 123 load from an 8 lb 16 inch barrel rifle:
    Assuming 19 grains of powder

    Recoil Impulse in (lbs sec) 1.6
    Velocity of recoiling firearm (fps) 6.44
    Free recoil energy in (ft/lbs) 5.16

    For M855 from an 8 lb 16 inch barrel rifle:
    Assuming 25 grains of powder

    Recoil Impulse in (lbs sec) 1.25
    Velocity of recoiling firearm (fps) 5.04
    Free recoil energy in (ft/lbs) 3.15

    From 6.8 SPC, 8 lbs rifle:
    Assuming 25 grains of powder

    Recoil Impulse in (lbs sec) 1.68
    Velocity of recoiling firearm (fps) 6.78
    Free recoil energy in (ft/lbs) 5.70

    So it has more recoil than 5.56mm and less than 6.8 SPC.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,635
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by wileecoyote View Post
    Any idea on recoil for the supersonic loads? Where does it fall in the 5.56\6.8\7.62 spectrum?
    Pretty close to 6.8 recoil is what I would say. Much less than .308 recoil.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    91
    Feedback Score
    0
    Very interesting stuff, thanks RSilvers & Todd.k.

    Lucky for us Noveske will be making them both.....decisions decisions!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    18
    Feedback Score
    0
    My brother and I have shot the 300-221 Fireball at Mystery Mountain 3-gun matches using both subsonic and super sonic loads. The subsonic loads have much less recoil (see below).

    300-221 Fireball subsonic load (175g MK @1050 with a 8gr charge of AA#)
    Recoil Impulse in (lbs sec) 0.96
    Velocity of recoiling firearm (fps) 3.85
    Free recoil energy in (ft/lbs) 1.84

    If you sight your rifle to shoot the 125g (Speer TNT) bullet 5 in. high at 100 yrds, your zero will be at about 220 yrds., and 5 in. low at 260 yrds. At about 290 yrds you will be about 10 in. low. So a "lollipop" hold on a 10 in plate will give you a hit out to about 200-210 yrds. A 12 o-clock hold will give you a hit out to about 290-300.

    Interestingly, with the same site setting. a 175 gr subsonic load, the "zero" point of aim (±0.5 in.) is from 10-50yrds, and about 10 in low at 110 yrds. So from about 75 -to-110 yrds a 12 o-clock hold will hit within a 10 in plate.

    I hope this is useful

    320pf

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Upcountry South Carolina
    Posts
    245
    Feedback Score
    0
    Excellent info, 320pf, what were the 7mm Whisper folks doing?
    Pat

    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Hostilis Civitas!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    18
    Feedback Score
    0
    Actually, there are not very many 7mm whispers out there because the 7mm does not offer any advantage in the sub-sonic realm.

    There has been some questioning about why the 30 cal was chosen over the 7mm. Well, with sub-sonics the loads are limited to about 1050-1080fps, so the only way to increase bullet energy is to increase bullet weight. The heaviest 7mm bullet with a high BC that is readily available is the 175 g MK. Here are the BC data for this bullet:

    .608 @ 2100 fps and above
    .582 between 2100 and 1530 fps
    .532 between 1530 and 1300 fps
    .500 @ 1300 fps and below

    In contrast, the heaviest .308 cal bullet with a high BC that is readily available is the 240 g MK. Here are the BC data for this bullet:

    .711 @ 2150 fps and above
    .702 between 2150 and 1800 fps
    .685 @ 1800 fps and below

    So as you can see, the 240g MK has much better sub-sonic ballistics than the 7mm bullet. A 300g .338 cal bullet would be even better but a .338 cal bullet does not leave much of a shoulder to work with using a 223 case. One could consider the 338 Specter but you are not using a 223 case so you have to invest in different mags and bolt/carrier group.

    The reason we did not use 240g MK in the 3-gun match is that all of the shots are within about 50 yrds and 240g bullets are much more expensive than 175g surplus bullets.

    I hope this helps.

    320pf
    Last edited by 320pf; 10-25-10 at 20:44.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •