Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: using dogs to attack tanks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    7488 ft.
    Posts
    2,458
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)

    Lightbulb using dogs to attack tanks

    This story made me sad.



    Anti-tank dog

    During the Second World War, the Russian Army came up with an ingenious defence against German tanks. Starving dogs would have bombs strapped to them, and then sent toward the enemy vehicles. The dogs had been trained to retrieve food from under Russian tanks, and the idea was that they would dash under the German tanks, seeking food, and in doing so activate a large wooden trigger on their backs. Unfortunately, having been trained using Soviet tanks, the dogs of war much preferred running under Russian tanks. Added to that, the noise of the battlefield confused and frightened them, culminating in an entire troupe of bomb-dogs running amok in a battlefield, endangering everyone and forcing the retreat of the Russian forces. Although credited with the destruction of over 300 Nazi tanks, the dogs were retired from service shortly after.
    http://www.sciencepunk.com/2008/05/f...actually-made/
    Last edited by 500grains; 10-29-10 at 14:20.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia / Afghanistan
    Posts
    2,480
    Feedback Score
    54 (100%)
    Sad indeed, considering they could have used members of the Straf battalions (whom the Soviets used to clear minefields by hand) for this type of operation.
    SSG Jimmy Ide- KIA 28 Aug 10, Hyderabad, AFG

    1SG Blue Rowe- KIA 26 May 09, Panjshir, AFG.

    RIP Brothers

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    350
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by GermanSynergy View Post
    Sad indeed, considering they could have used members of the Straf battalions (whom the Soviets used to clear minefields by hand) for this type of operation.
    Are you really implying that it would have been somehow better to use humans for this?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia / Afghanistan
    Posts
    2,480
    Feedback Score
    54 (100%)
    I'm surprised, given the level of ruthlessness and sadism of the Soviets towards their own men, that they did not opt to use straf troops for such an operation. Training canines for such an operation was no doubt costly and time consuming, and in 1941-42 period, the USSR was in dire need of both. The Soviets utilized straf troops for other suicide missions, such as charging German positions en masse or clearing minefield by hand, and
    I was simply wondering why the Soviets opted to expend the time, resources, etc when they clearly had little compunction sending entire army groups off to be destroyed in the wake of the German advance. Using humans or dogs for such missions is deplorable.


    This is what I wished to convey.


    Quote Originally Posted by Alric View Post
    Are you really implying that it would have been somehow better to use humans for this?
    Last edited by GermanSynergy; 10-29-10 at 14:58.
    SSG Jimmy Ide- KIA 28 Aug 10, Hyderabad, AFG

    1SG Blue Rowe- KIA 26 May 09, Panjshir, AFG.

    RIP Brothers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    350
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Thanks for the clarification. I agree, it is deplorable.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,808
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alric View Post
    Thanks for the clarification. I agree, it is deplorable.
    I heard the dogs couldn't make a distinction between Soviet and German tanks and this was the reason for the end of the practice. Its interesting to note, the Germans were appalled by the tactic.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    13,117
    Feedback Score
    0
    Clearing mines by hand is one thing, clearing them by foot, at full sprint is another.
    I just did two lines of powdered wig powder, cranked up some Lee Greenwood, and recited the BoR. - Outlander Systems

    I'm a professional WAGer - WillBrink /// "Comey is a smarmy, self righteous mix of J. Edgar Hoover and a gay Lurch from the "Adams Family"." -Averageman

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    907
    Feedback Score
    0
    Maybe I'm the only one, but I think it's ingenious. It's a true GBU. Only part that would suck is if it decided to come back

    It was a war that killed probably over 100,000,000 people intentionally. So the idea of dogs being killed isn't that disturbing when you compare the two.
    _________________________________________

    I understand too is an adverb and to is a preposition, I still prefer using to in place of too.

    The way I see it I'll save maybe 5-10 minutes over my lifetime not typing that extra o at the end of to. Even typing up this explanation saves me more time than typing that extra o


    Cheers,
    Mr. Smiles

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,770
    Feedback Score
    0
    Considering Germany sent kids to knock out T-34's with panzerfaust and bicycles.

    Total WAR.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,211
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_smiles View Post
    Maybe I'm the only one, but I think it's ingenious. It's a true GBU. Only part that would suck is if it decided to come back

    It was a war that killed probably over 100,000,000 people intentionally. So the idea of dogs being killed isn't that disturbing when you compare the two.
    Seriously. If my (our) country was being invaded, I would sacrifice every dog on the planet to have a chance at stopping foreign tanks from entering my city without a second thought.

    I would air-drop cats and take shelter.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •