The AR series are an inherently accurate system even in stock form. However the acceptance standard, and appropriately so, is 4-6moa (I forget). In case thousands be need spit out by whoever bids on short notice wartime production.
Ammunition and then FF rail was identified by a SOCOM study long ago as a marked, easily adopted, improvement in accuracy. Additionally the heat sink qualities of FFrails have benefits
FF rails aren't, specifically, being "resisted". It's just a matter of priorities and infrastructure. Smaller, more agile and capable units, with different mission sets, can adapt individual training and logistical requirements quickly.
What would the cost vs value of changing a rail system service wide be when maybe 1% of users could utilize or notice the improvement. The current rails get the job done.
Bookmarks