Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Tru Glo TFO sight mod for hard use durability

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    287
    Feedback Score
    0

    Tru Glo TFO sight mod for hard use durability

    I like the concept of the Tru Glo TFO sights and am aware of the problems people have been having with the front fiber optic tube falling off.

    Since the fiber optic tube is not designed to be replaceable by design I was thinking of filling the opening on top with clear epoxy. This would probably address the issue of the fiber optic tube falling off or breaking and keep the fiber optic tube from deteriorating as the epoxy would shield it from the elements. Being clear, it would still allow the fiber optic tube to gather light and glow.

    I got this idea from a DIY article on putting clear windows on non-windowed Pmags. I was thinking of using the same Devcon clear epoxy.

    Since this seems to be the main reliability issue on these sights maybe this idea could make it feasible for hard use?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,225
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    Give it a try, not out anything if it doesn't work as it wil fall out anyhow some time soon.
    GET IN YOUR BUBBLE!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    751
    Feedback Score
    0
    Junk, junk, junk, did I say they are junk? I tried two sets and both lasted a mere 3-4 months before the front sight broke. I used these sights on a G17 and a G34. If you use the pistol and actually train with them, IMO, they won't hold up. Simply drawing from the holster and other handgun manipulations are too much for the sights to handle.

    Glaring concept, poor implementation.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    287
    Feedback Score
    0
    No dispute from me that as-is they will, more likely than not, fail.

    But it is truly a great concept that I just could not pass up trying to make work despite all the negative experiences with these sights.

    Reading up on these it seems that the main mode of failure is the fiber optics falling off and if the epoxy keeps them in place and keep them from deteriorating it could be the solution.

    Of course better minds than me congregate here so I am just throwing the idea out and maybe someone might have tried it already or know a reason why this won't work.

    I'm currently researching on adhesives and epoxies because I have come across comments that certain kinds can weaken the FO.

    Any experience, observations, or violent reactions are welcome.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    SML, VA
    Posts
    300
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have 5 different sets on my game guns. Both the front and rear tubes have come out. The company has repaced them no charge, no hassle but if you find something that will seal the tubes in, let us know. I look the sight picture and the ability to use them in all light conditions but I am afraid to use them on any of my carry guns.
    The sights still work without the tubes and the night glow is still there but the bight dots are missing. They are usable but distracting.
    "Being PARANOID is just plain smart thinking when they are really out to get you!"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    287
    Feedback Score
    0
    That's what I hope to find, Paul.

    I've been doing some research on-line on what adhesives to use as I've read that some adhesives can weaken the fiber optic tubes.

    Looking for epoxies that are clear enough to let the fiber optic tubes do their job while also not being harmful to them.

    There are special adhesives and epoxies used to bind sections of fiber optics together and to even optically-clear epoxies that are used to encapsulate LED's and fiber optics for industrial use. Looking into those, am hoping they are available in small quantities and not too expensive.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    621
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Sunday as I was shooting the Paul's standards for time (normal in a class to prove that every thing is attainable), I was failing miserably. I chalked it up to being sick lately, although I'd shot really well the week before.

    When we went to shoot the barricade module later, I was missing the steel at 20yds, which surprised me. A senior student started saying 'left, left, left', so I REALLY slowed down and took 3 shots, all of which missed. I held a foot right and then started ringing the steel 100%.

    After unloading and showing clear I examined the sights and found that the front (which I had loc-tite'd in place) was flopping around. I reinstalled it, this time loc-tit'ing the threads AND a good dab of JB Weld underneath. I don't have these on a serious use gun, but the failure was disturbing.

    ETA:

    MOTHER F**K. These things aren't even a year old and I just looked and noticed that the front didn't seem very bright. Took it into a dark bathroom and sure enough, being shot while loose has killed the front tritium vial. These things suck.
    Last edited by KellyTTE; 11-17-10 at 20:09.
    Kelly H
    Yes, I know. No, I won't tell you.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    287
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KellyTTE View Post
    Sunday as I was shooting the Paul's standards for time (normal in a class to prove that every thing is attainable), I was failing miserably. I chalked it up to being sick lately, although I'd shot really well the week before.

    When we went to shoot the barricade module later, I was missing the steel at 20yds, which surprised me. A senior student started saying 'left, left, left', so I REALLY slowed down and took 3 shots, all of which missed. I held a foot right and then started ringing the steel 100%.

    After unloading and showing clear I examined the sights and found that the front (which I had loc-tite'd in place) was flopping around. I reinstalled it, this time loc-tit'ing the threads AND a good dab of JB Weld underneath. I don't have these on a serious use gun, but the failure was disturbing.

    ETA:

    MOTHER F**K. These things aren't even a year old and I just looked and noticed that the front didn't seem very bright. Took it into a dark bathroom and sure enough, being shot while loose has killed the front tritium vial. These things suck.
    Sorry to hear that Kelly, thanks for sharing, that's one more thing to look out for in this project. Will be checking my own front sight now.

    To those who are following, I just got off the phone with a company that makes clear resins for the electronics industry. They have what seems to be the right product for this experiment, a 2-part epoxy resin that is liquid while uncured, dries optically clear, has the right refraction index to allow the fiber optics to gather light, and compatible with the fiber optic tube material. Reasonably water proof and heat resistant too, as these are used on traffic light LEDs I believe. Pending another conversation with their R&D I may be able to get a sample to try out.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    129
    Feedback Score
    0
    We think alike. I toyed with exactly the same idea. Until reading KellyTTE's post, I'd never heard of any failure in detail that wasn't just the fiber optic rod coming loose. However, I never got around to it since I couldn't find the sights available in anything but a complete set (didn't want the rear). I think Speed Shooter Specialties now has the front sight only for a reasonable price, so it might be worthwhile to revisit the idea... But this is what eventually but the kabosh on the whole thing for me:

    Unless you're outside with a lot of ambient light, you don't get much glow without a lot of exposed fiber. The HiViz units I have on my competition guns use an enclosed rod for durability. This has some effect on how bright they are. The TFOs look like they only have a slit on the top for daytime glow. Even with clear epoxy, you're probably going to get substandard brightness once you begin putting anything there. In bright daylight, you may still get a decent amount of brightness, but anywhere without a lot of ambient (or direct overhead light in the case of the TFO) is probably going to produce a dim glow at best. Probably not much better than bright paint. At night, I can't imagine that they would be any better than any other tritium sight.

    With that in mind, I just ordered one of these with the idea that in anything but a bright, sunshiny day outside, the orange paint will be just as visible as a heavily shielded fiber-optic rod. The tritium should be more or less the same as anything else.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    129
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by glen View Post
    To those who are following, I just got off the phone with a company that makes clear resins for the electronics industry. They have what seems to be the right product for this experiment, a 2-part epoxy resin that is liquid while uncured, dries optically clear, has the right refraction index to allow the fiber optics to gather light, and compatible with the fiber optic tube material. Reasonably water proof and heat resistant too, as these are used on traffic light LEDs I believe. Pending another conversation with their R&D I may be able to get a sample to try out.
    Good luck. If you're going whole hog on this, you might consider opening the sides of the post to allow more ambient light to reach the fiber-optic rod.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •