Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: glock 21 for a hk usp

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    cincinnati
    Posts
    296
    Feedback Score
    6 (88%)

    glock 21 for a hk usp

    hey fellas need some help. im trading my glock 21 for a 9mm and was offered a HK USP 9mm full size variant 7 with the LEM trigger?.
    i know its dao. is that a decent pistol? i know hk is supposed to be the shit. its a variant 7 with the lem
    Last edited by fivefivesix; 11-17-10 at 09:20.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia / Afghanistan
    Posts
    2,480
    Feedback Score
    54 (100%)
    The USP is blocky and the ergonomics leave much to be desired. If possible, try before you buy. USP's are not exactly renowned for stellar trigger pulls...
    SSG Jimmy Ide- KIA 28 Aug 10, Hyderabad, AFG

    1SG Blue Rowe- KIA 26 May 09, Panjshir, AFG.

    RIP Brothers

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    468
    Feedback Score
    0
    HK USP is known for reliability and durability. If you've already seen the pistol, and you like it, and its LEM trigger, then there's no reason to advise you against the trade. If it were me, I'd be looking at Glock 19 or M&P 9 FS.
    Under the sword lifted high, there is Hell, making you tremble. But go ahead, and there is the land of Bliss. ~ Miyamoto Musashi

    DISCLOSURE: I represent SECRET CITY WEAPONEERS, purveyor of K-25 Multi-Role Concealment Holsters. I may, therefore, be biased...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    cincinnati
    Posts
    296
    Feedback Score
    6 (88%)
    ive decided against the usp. i found a guyand were trading. he has a g17 with a 34 slide that goes with it,and has trijicon night sights.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    783
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by fivefivesix View Post
    ive decided against the usp. i found a guyand were trading. he has a g17 with a 34 slide that goes with it,and has trijicon night sights.
    That is a much better trade IMO.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    70
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Good choice. I had a USP9 and it is a fine pistol. But it is enormous for what it is (a 15 round 9mm). It was too big for my hands, and I could never get used to the long trigger pull. Ended up selling it to buy a Glock, and have no regrets about "downgrading".

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    62
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Well, I'll just throw this out there, but I have a 9mm USPf and a Glock 19. I carry the Glock because of its size, but I prefer shooting the USP. It is on my hip when I am not carrying concealed.
    edit: I'm not a big dude either. I never really understood the blocky grip argument; handles well for me.
    Last edited by sacmaster; 11-17-10 at 23:43. Reason: add more

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    493
    Feedback Score
    0
    The HK is a nice pistol but it sounds like you found a much better deal, and if you were already comfortable with the G21 then the transition should be easy for you. You already know how to shoot and maintain the Glock and now you have the caliber you want with night sights and an extra slide. Unless you had a real problem with the Glock ergonomics I think you've made a wise decision. Good luck.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    896
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Personally Id recommend passing on the USP. If you want HK the p30 is a much better solution.

    If you arent stuck on HK, Id suggest a glock or an M&P.
    Dont sweat the small stuff.


    If youre not taking fire, its all small stuff.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sopines, NC
    Posts
    1,759
    Feedback Score
    52 (100%)
    Don't do it. I traded a Glock 23 for a USP40 and regretted it as soon as I shot it. I'd tried a USP several years ago and thought I remembered it being pretty good. Not so. If the USP didn't have HK's name on it then nobody would give it a second look. It's big, fat, has bad control placement, terrible trigger, and weirdly snappy recoil The Glock was much better in pretty much every category.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •