Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Gas Tube Length, Dwell Time, Gas Port Size- Do They Really Increase/Decrease Recoil?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,422
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    Gas Tube Length, Dwell Time, Gas Port Size- Do They Really Increase/Decrease Recoil?

    I've seen the claim several times that gas tube length, dwell time and gas port size can increase or decrease recoil energy.

    I don't mean perceived recoil nor do I mean how sharp or soft the recoil feels but the actual amount of energy generated during recoil. All else being equal, does a midlength rifle actually kick less than a carbine length? Or is it just a softer recoil as the impulse is spread out over a longer time?

    If the carbine length does generate more recoil energy, where is the empirical data to show this?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    962
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    Impulse is instantaneous and is the reaction from the bullet going down the barrel.

    2 stages of recoil
    1. Impulse
    2. BCG expending extra energy into your body.

    In an ideal case, the BCG will have no velocity and 0 kinetic energy at the end of the buffer tube, therefore no energy to send into your body. Impulse will always be felt, the only thing that reduces it is using lighter bullets.

    Longer dwell = more gas = more energy to BCG
    Less dwell = less gas = just enough energy to BCG
    the midlength is closer to the ideal case.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    7,126
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    i disagree- the amount of energy the BCG transfers into the shooter is very dependent on the speed it's going when it bottoms out on the spring.

    if the BCG is flying back faster than it needs to be for reliable cycling, then you're gonna have an "over-gassed" gun with more recoil- felt or otherwise.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    7,126
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    mid-lengths supposedly reduce impulse- felt recoil- by shortening the amount of time the bore is injecting the action with gas. moving the port out closer to the bore means is takes more time to get gas back to the key, and having the bullet pop out the muzzle sooner after passing the gas port then cuts off the already slightly lower pressure gas.

    so, on paper, it DOES reduce impulse. personally, i don't really notice a difference- at least between 14.5s.... it's been many years since i've fired a 16" carbine length gun

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    962
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    Naturally. Proven by the equation KE = 0.5mv^2 stick in 0 for v and KE must equal zero. That's why I say for a system that is gassed just enough, the velocity (and also kinetic energy) of the BCG at the end of the buffer tube will be very close to 0.

    I guess it somewhat boils down to semantics. In a physics sense, the impulse occurs before the bullet ever passes the gas port. The expanding gasses act in the direction of the bullet but also in the opposite direction, causing the recoil.

    Quote Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
    the amount of energy the BCG transfers into the shooter is very dependent on the speed it's going when it bottoms out on the spring.

    if the BCG is flying back faster than it needs to be for reliable cycling, then you're gonna have an "over-gassed" gun with more recoil- felt or otherwise.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    7,126
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric D. View Post
    Naturally. Proven by the equation KE = 0.5mv^2 stick in 0 for v and KE must equal zero. That's why I say for a system that is gassed just enough, the velocity (and also kinetic energy) of the BCG at the end of the buffer tube will be very close to 0.

    I guess it somewhat boils down to semantics. In a physics sense, the impulse occurs before the bullet ever passes the gas port. The expanding gasses act in the direction of the bullet but also in the opposite direction, causing the recoil.
    semantics in that initial recoil is caused by the bullet, but followed up with another bump from the carrier.. but since the initial recoil is only part of felt recoil, changing bullet weight (or otherwise changing initial recoil-since initial recoil isn't just from the effort of shoving the bullet down the bore, it's also contributed to by the propellant blast) isn't the "only way" to reduce felt recoil. both have to be addressed.
    Last edited by bkb0000; 11-20-10 at 22:11.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,422
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    So far, we have that changes in the dwell time, tube length and gas port will affect perceived recoil (felt recoil) but does not increase nor decrease the actual recoil energy or free recoil

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric D. View Post
    Impulse is instantaneous and is the reaction from the bullet going down the barrel.

    2 stages of recoil
    1. Impulse
    2. BCG expending extra energy into your body.

    In an ideal case, the BCG will have no velocity and 0 kinetic energy at the end of the buffer tube, therefore no energy to send into your body. Impulse will always be felt, the only thing that reduces it is using lighter bullets.

    Longer dwell = more gas = more energy to BCG
    Less dwell = less gas = just enough energy to BCG
    the midlength is closer to the ideal case.
    Not quite accurate. The BCG cannot expend extra energy into your body. What got it moving in the first place is the energy that generates the recoil. That part of the energy is stored in the momentum of the BCG and compression of the spring.

    Shooter's body provides (along with the mass of the rifle) the resistance needed for the BCG to compress the spring. This will transfer kinetic energy to the body of the shooter even if the BCG stops before it bottoms out the sprinq
    Last edited by MistWolf; 11-21-10 at 06:47.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    South La.
    Posts
    1,892
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    .

    No expert but this is what I think...you can't create energy and recoil is energy.

    So, if the rifles weigh the same with the same weight bullet and charged round AND the FPS of the bullet out the barrel is the same with the same FH/Comp's, they have to have the same recoil. The "felt recoil" can be different but the true actual total energy pushing to the rear will be the same.

    The "felt recoil" can be different because the rifle buffer, springs, gas port, gas tube, etc. spread that release of recoil energy over a longer amount of time, instead of just a sharp impact to the rear. Example is a mid-length vs. a M4.

    If one gun of the alike guns has more recoil (actual total energy pushing to the rear) then the FPS will be different. The energy that is causing more recoil has to come from somewhere, so it is robbed from the speed of the bullet. Now, how much speed is lost, who knows, but I would think it would be measurable. I reckon this is called, "over gassed".

    This make sense? or am I way off?

    .
    Last edited by ucrt; 11-21-10 at 14:54. Reason: Clarity

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    962
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)
    The two are one in the same. The propellant blast is the effort shoving the bullet down the bore.

    Quote Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
    initial recoil isn't just from the effort of shoving the bullet down the bore, it's also contributed to by the propellant blast

    Yes, this is the same principle air bags and crumpling auto frames were designed around.

    Quote Originally Posted by ucrt View Post
    .
    The "felt recoil" can be different because it spreads that release of recoil energy over a longer amount of time, so it isn't just a sharp impact to the rear. Example of a mid-length vs. a M4.
    You are mostly correct. The bullet isn't robbed of energy per se, rather (assuming same weight bullets) its given more energy to increase the FPS (KE = 0.5mv^2) Conversely, a heavier bullet requires more energy to give it the same velocity of a lighter one. If you've ever shot 12ga slugs, you know they kick a lot more than bird shot, its because they are heavier and have the same muzzle velocity (~1200 FPS). This energy is transferred in both equal and opposite directions, which explains the extra recoil.

    Quote Originally Posted by ucrt View Post
    .
    If one gun of the guns has more recoil (actual total energy pushing to the rear) then the FPS will be different. That energy that is causing more recoil has to come from somewhere, so it is robbed from the speed of the bullet. Now, how much speed is lost, who knows, but I would think it would be measurable. I reckon this is called, "over gassed".
    Last edited by Eric D.; 11-21-10 at 15:05.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    7,126
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eric D. View Post
    The two are one in the same. The propellant blast is the effort shoving the bullet down the bore.
    if there was nothing in the bore, as in a complete vacuum, the propellant blast from a blank would still move the weapon rearward by itself. not by much, unless it was also in a state of inertia, but its still part of the equation.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •