Magic, that wasn't directed at you. Moreso a comment on the general direction of the thread and the various comments / complaints about existing good products, i.e. the front sight. There are definitely configurations that don't work with the integrated front sight, but that isn't reason enough to say its junk, as some have implied here, and demand that it be removed.
It would be a nice option to have a URX rail similar to the URX I, but with the integrated swivel pockets like the URX II for builds that require it. To my knowledge the URX I wasn't produced in large numbers though and eventually evolved into the URX II as part of the IWS concept that was first debuted with the SR15 E3 IWS approx. 2 years before it became an actual commercial offering.
There have been lots of "they should do this or that" comments that are derailing the original topic. KAC has a good track record of providing what their customers are looking for over the last couple of years. III's comment about a new URX offering in the OP is a good example of market demand driving product offerings. However, I think we take it a little too far sometimes in the demands we make of manufacturers and we take their openness / accessibility as a liscence to critique every detail. Personally, I would like to see this thread develop as AC intended; a way to keep up with actual product developments and enhancements coming from KAC. Every day there seems to be a new SR15 thread and good information gets watered down in all the chatter.
I'm just surprised that something as innocuous as a front site has generated this much discussion. If people really don't like it that much, there are other good options available. IMHO, the integrated front site is what makes the URX II unique and for many, a desirable product. It saves weight and with the new URX pricing, it saves money too.
Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks