|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Well I would keep the DD, use the 1k for a class and ammo.
Never judge a man by his success, judge by how he deals with his failures!- L.E.C.
Some People suck at being Human!- Me
"To keep you is no gain, to destroy you is no loss."- Khmer Rouge
Yeah i think I will. Anyone know of a class coming to dfw soon?
There is a Vickers Shooting Method approved instructor in Allen (I think). His name escapes me at the moment and I'm on my phone - but a search should turn him up.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
The will to win is worthless if you do not have the will to prepare. -Thane Yost
Whining in a forum that people have seen your thread, but not replied, reeks of an odd brand of desperation. - Me
Titling your thread "To XYZ or Not to XYZ" will cause me to completely ignore your thread.
I believe that the phrase "shooting the.........out of it" would be taken differently by different people who can afford more or less ammo.
You should step back and think, what will the SCAR do for you that the DD won't? If this is for training/plinking/etc, why convert to a SCAR when you hadnt even run the DD to its full potentail? If you want a SCAR because of its CDI factor, theres nothing wrong with that either. SCAR's can be had for like $1900.00 now but what does it do that the DD cant? The $1000 can be put towards training, ammo, a COLT 6920 so you can have another/or backup rifle. Which one fits your use better is what you need to ask yourself.
I would just keep the DD and invest in an aimpoint and ammunition/training and start shooting it. IMO, although a SCAR is a great rifle, I can't see how it is worth $1000 more than the DD.
Bookmarks