Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Gen 4 G17

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    167
    Feedback Score
    0

    Gen 4 G17

    Yesterday I shot the new Gen 4 G17 for the first time. My friends and I went to the handgun range and I took my M&P9 and MkIII. I very nice Marine officer had just bought this G17 a few hours ago and he let me put 100 rounds of WWB through it. I am surprised how well this handgun shoots. It is the most accurate Glock I've shot @ 15 yds. It is a little big bigger than my M&P9 but it feels lighter. The G17 is much more snappier than my M&P9, however, obtaining the sights was easy. The trigger feels lighter than my M&P9 with DCAEK kit but it is longer. Unfortunately I did not took my camera to bring back pictures of the groupings. Overall the Gen 4 feels much better in the hand than any Gen 3 I've tried and was easier to shoot. The only bothersome feature I encountered was how snappy it is.

    Anyone else has similar experience?
    “In the Soviet Union, capitalism triumphed over communism. In this country, capitalism triumphed over democracy.”

    - Fran Lebowitz.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Greatest Planet in the Universe
    Posts
    3,092
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    I agree with all points except I've not shot a thusly-equipped M&P9. One thing you did not mention - perhaps you did not try it - when shooting at my capability (for speed) the Glock feels 'better' as I perceive it to have less muzzle flip (but more push against the hand); 6 on one hand 1/2 dozen on the other as the total Energy is constant - something has to give, right? Riight? Yep. The M&P feels more "natural" in my hands (a function of superior ergonomics). I also find the Gen IV to be remarkably accurate (for a striker fired polymer pistol).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    1,691
    Feedback Score
    0
    Could you elaborate on snappy? I've got a 2400 rds in an M&P 9mm and triple that through Gen 4 9mms and I'm trying to relate to your description.

    I've seen other experienced shooters compare and say they thought the M&P recoil felt softer. I think that could be possible due to the ergo grip design of the M&P. I can't say I could easily distinguish a difference in actual recoil transmitted to the the hand.

    I thought the M&P front end rose more in recoil than the Glocks - which I attribute to the somewhat higher bore axis than the Glock's. This is probably an over rated attribute as it's all occurring in a fraction of a second and the M&P comes right back down on target.
    So although I guzzle Glock koolaid, I realize this difference is not necessarily a significant issue for good shooting.

    Should we assume this gun ran the WWB reliably? You didn't mention the $64,000 question about anyone's Gen 4 experience.
    "Whatever it's for; it wasn't possible until now!!!" - KrampusArms

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    167
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sorry to not elaborate in my wording. I am still working very hard in my English. By snappier I mean that it was pushing my hand more similar to the Glock 22. I did not shoot the G17 for speed. I was just focusing in accuracy. It did feed the 100 rounds of WWB I put through it + the Federal ammo the young officer put through it.

    I am not a gun expert and I am not close to being one. This are just my observations and differences I felt next to my M&P9. I have about 4,000 rounds through my M&P9 and it has never been cleaned.
    “In the Soviet Union, capitalism triumphed over communism. In this country, capitalism triumphed over democracy.”

    - Fran Lebowitz.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dvdlpzus View Post
    Overall the Gen 4 feels much better in the hand than any Gen 3 I've tried and was easier to shoot. The only bothersome feature I encountered was how snappy it is.

    Anyone else has similar experience?
    Exactly opposite, actually. My gen4 g17 is the softest-shooting 9mm I've ever shot. It's noticeably softer than my gen2 g19 back to back. Mine does, however, have the original recoil spring, and has been utterly reliable through a few thousand rounds of wwb, wolf, s&b, corbon, etc.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    1,691
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dvdlpzus View Post
    Sorry to not elaborate in my wording. I am still working very hard in my English. By snappier I mean that it was pushing my hand more similar to the Glock 22. I did not shoot the G17 for speed. I was just focusing in accuracy. It did feed the 100 rounds of WWB I put through it + the Federal ammo the young officer put through it.

    I am not a gun expert and I am not close to being one. This are just my observations and differences I felt next to my M&P9. I have about 4,000 rounds through my M&P9 and it has never been cleaned.
    You are off to a very good start. Most gun owners never see 4K rounds.
    "Whatever it's for; it wasn't possible until now!!!" - KrampusArms

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Midlands SC
    Posts
    860
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JHC View Post
    Most gun owners never see 4K rounds.
    Very true. However, I must not be "most gun owners". My G17 has seen over 200 IDPA matches (100+ rounds each give or take) and plenty of range time. I'd say I've got close to 35k rounds through mine. Original barrel, spring, and guide rod. She still shoots POA-POI at 25 yards and holds a damn tight group. Hard to beat the G17 for a 9mm pistol.
    A man with a gun is a citizen. A man without a gun is a subject.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •