Or, my solution: G&R LPK without the hammer, trigger, disconnector and associated springs and pins, and Spike's Battle Trigger.
Benefits of everything, no downsides.![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Or, my solution: G&R LPK without the hammer, trigger, disconnector and associated springs and pins, and Spike's Battle Trigger.
Benefits of everything, no downsides.![]()
Some thoughts on LPK's.
There are only two TRUE mil-spec LPK's. Those are Colt and FN's. Everything else is a third or fourth best.
With that said, we use only the best parts we can find. A good many of these parts are made by LMT (FYI).
C4
Last edited by C4IGrant; 12-12-10 at 16:04.
Thanks for all of the replies.I decided I am going to build 2 new lowers now.One with a full G&R lpk and the other with a psa lpk with the spikes battle trigger.
I read once that the spikes LPK were based on DPMS parts?
FFL/SOT
Chuck Norris has to maintain a concealed weapon license in all 50 states in order to legally wear pants.
I also forgot to mention that I wanted to spend no more than $100 for the lpk.
"Perfect Practice Makes Perfect"
"There are 550 million firearms on this planet. That's one firearm for every 12 people. The question is... How do we arm the other 11?" Lord of War.
"I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them." Thomas Jefferson
American by birth, southern by the grace of American Van Lines
http://i823.photobucket.com/albums/z...l_launcher.gif
My vote is for the G&R. I like it on my bcm build. Good quality components. I can't tell any difference between it and my stock colt lower.
I went with the G&R LPK. You can tell they have good , quality parts. No complaints with mine whatsoever. However, from the people I've spoken with, I'll go with Spikes on the next LPK.
Bookmarks