Ouch! Comparing DPReview.com to TOS is just plain mean
I have bought several digital cameras over the past few years including DSLR's and I have found that DPReview.com has always been pretty accurate. In fact, most photo-geek sites are pretty honest since there are so many easily measurable metrics that don't really exist for AR's.
My comment about CNET is because that is a tech-geek site, not a photo-geek site.
More importantly, what bad reviews are you talking about? A quick Yahoo search pulls up the following reviews from serious photo sites, all of which are overall positive. (Photo-geeks can always find nitpicky problems!)
http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/con...Conclusion.htm
http://www.photographyblog.com/revie...ew/conclusion/
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...0/EXFH100A.HTM
http://www.digitalcamera-hq.com/products/casio-fh100
I did not buy this camera for high speed video. I wanted a super wide zoom with fast cycle time and this camera came up so I bought it. For less than the cost of a case of ammo I figured what the heck!
Dennis.





Reply With Quote


Bookmarks