Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 46

Thread: Women in combat arms MOS's

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    1,384
    Feedback Score
    0

    Women in combat arms MOS's

    I served in an infantry unit in both Afghanistan (2002) and Iraq (2003) and I think this is a terrible idea that will surely ruin the effectiveness of our infantry, special forces, armor, and artillery units. Here is the link and what are your thoughts?

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41083172/ns/us_news-life

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Its like a liberal parade of degenerates right through the gates of Ft. Bragg.



    Wait til you see a dude in a woman's uniform because he got his tid bits chopped off.




    Edit: And no I dont think women should be in combat arms. Just medical, clerical, staff type positions.
    Last edited by Belmont31R; 01-14-11 at 23:52.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,432
    Feedback Score
    0
    As a civilian, I have questions about whether this will measure make our fighting force more effective. Yes, we know women have fought. But I don't know how well they fought. Do they bring some new capability to combat arms units? Can they carry/drag someone however many meters? Pull someone up over a half-wall? Can they carry the required loadout the required distance?


    -B
    Last edited by BAC; 01-15-11 at 00:21.
    RIP, Jeff Dorr: 1964 - July 17, 2009


    "When young men seek to be like you, when lazy men resent you, when powerful men look over their shoulder at you, when cowardly men plot behind your back, when corrupt men wish you were gone and evil men want you dead . . . Only then will you have done your share." - Phil Messina

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,438
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)

    G.I. Jane

    Women in combat is a bad idea and everyone knows it.

    Just like in law enforcement and fire departments, the physical standards for entry will have to be lowered for women to even get to the selection phase let alone get through the training.

    When will women, within 3 months of their 18th birthday be required to register for the selective service? When Jimmy Carter re-established the Selective Service program, there was a recommendation that it be extended to include women but of course it failed. There was a subsequent challenge to the law as unconstitutional that went to SCOTUS. The court held that since women couldn't serve in combat roles, they couldn't be drafted. Guess its time to take a new look at selective service.
    Last edited by MarkG; 01-15-11 at 05:41.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    907
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yet the standards won't be the same, bunch of hypocritical pc bullshit is all.
    _________________________________________

    I understand too is an adverb and to is a preposition, I still prefer using to in place of too.

    The way I see it I'll save maybe 5-10 minutes over my lifetime not typing that extra o at the end of to. Even typing up this explanation saves me more time than typing that extra o


    Cheers,
    Mr. Smiles

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,036
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Most people have a very short attention span and lack the ability to put anything in historical context. Whenever this subject comes up, I try to point to movies and shows that I think illustrate the life and times of your typical dog faced Earth Pig.

    A lot of people look at this current war and the average life of the fobbit (which is 80% of the force) and assume that is what it must be like in Combat Arms.

    Check out the movie Hamburger Hill. How would women fit in that sort of combat environment.

    Look at the Band of Brothers series or The Pacific. Same question.

    Or, look no further than Restrepo to see how different life is at one of these COPs over a nice FOB like BAF, KAF, or Salerno.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    39 (100%)

    NO!, wait HELL NO!

    Women are intelligent and have their place per se in the military. But they lack the requisite all around strength and endurance to undertake the arduous task of prolonged combat. Combat is tough on men for Christ's sake. Many men have difficulty at times adapting and performing duties in a trigger puller capacity. Adding women would just put a greater strain on those men already in that unit. Not to mention the whole psychological bullshit that men will run around stupid to protect a woman. It has been seen and proven. Female gets hit, men will continue to get killed and wounded in their attempt to save her. Granted we do it for our brothers, but we lose our heads and throw caution to the wind when it comes to a female.
    Never judge a man by his success, judge by how he deals with his failures!- L.E.C.

    Some People suck at being Human!- Me

    "To keep you is no gain, to destroy you is no loss."- Khmer Rouge

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,795
    Feedback Score
    0
    This is a really bad idea. I'm not say woman can't defend themselves when in certain combat conditions, but all this will result in, is "gender norming" or lowering the standards of performance to make a political statement, just like allowing Gays in the military. It will be a tremendous challenge to men who were raised to protect women and children at all cost, which is instinctively embedded in most men, to not coddling/protect them and compromising the mission or endangering themselves unnecessarily. Until they can perform to the same standard, it will not truly be same same, Keif Keif. Besides, it will never attract the hot women anyway.
    Last edited by RogerinTPA; 01-15-11 at 11:34. Reason: spelling
    For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area
    Posts
    2,006
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    The only way this might be a good idea is if they had the same physical standards for both men and women. Even then it would be uber iffy. Sure there are some dynamic butch women out there who could hack it, but they are a huge minority.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia / Afghanistan
    Posts
    2,480
    Feedback Score
    54 (100%)
    I agree, but this will never happen. Females have no place in Combat Arms MOS's for the reasons stated above.

    Additionally, how many females actually WANT to serve in the Infantry?

    Quote Originally Posted by HES View Post
    The only way this might be a good idea is if they had the same physical standards for both men and women. Even then it would be uber iffy. Sure there are some dynamic butch women out there who could hack it, but they are a huge minority.
    SSG Jimmy Ide- KIA 28 Aug 10, Hyderabad, AFG

    1SG Blue Rowe- KIA 26 May 09, Panjshir, AFG.

    RIP Brothers

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •