Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Magazine thoughts in light of current climate...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Fort Collins Colorado
    Posts
    2,672
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hmac View Post
    "This too shall pass". We are Americans, with the stereotypical American short attention span. Pretty soon, the horror and the outrage will fade from our national consciousness. We'll have to see what the NRA will let Congress have by way of compromise, but I'm guessing that if they let them have anything, it will relate to other methods of keeping guns out of the hands of crazy people.
    probably, but at some point the focus of gun policy has to go from keeping guns out of the hands of crazy people to putting bullets into crazy people.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,922
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    The Speaker of the House has said it ain't happening.

    He has the power to stop something like this cold all by himself.

    For all intents an purposes, nothing comes to the floor for a vote unless the Sepaker allows it.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia / Afghanistan
    Posts
    2,480
    Feedback Score
    54 (100%)
    Playing Devil's Advocate here for a second:

    We can only speculate what a new ban would bring- it may look nothing like the 1994 model. There may or may not be a grandfather clause to permit owners of standard capacity mags to even keep or use them legally (think NJ with the Florio gun ban of 1990).

    I agree with Heavy Metal on this one, however.


    Quote Originally Posted by Heavy Metal View Post
    The Speaker of the House has said it ain't happening.

    He has the power to stop something like this cold all by himself.

    For all intents an purposes, nothing comes to the floor for a vote unless the Sepaker allows it.
    SSG Jimmy Ide- KIA 28 Aug 10, Hyderabad, AFG

    1SG Blue Rowe- KIA 26 May 09, Panjshir, AFG.

    RIP Brothers

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,922
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Considering there are likely 50-100 million hi-caps in circulation, any ban without a Grandfather clause would be an enforcement and litigation nightmare.

    They weren't being nice when they grandfathered them the last time, they were being relaistic. Now, the number of hi-caps are proabally triple what they were pre-94 at a minimum.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    midwest
    Posts
    8,217
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Heavy Metal View Post
    The Speaker of the House has said it ain't happening.

    He has the power to stop something like this cold all by himself.

    For all intents an purposes, nothing comes to the floor for a vote unless the Sepaker allows it.
    Yeah, you're probably right. The almost total lack of current political furor and debate on the issue and the ongoing silence from the NRA pretty much tells the whole story.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    2,081
    Feedback Score
    5 (86%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hmac View Post
    Yeah, you're probably right. The almost total lack of current political furor and debate on the issue and the ongoing silence from the NRA pretty much tells the whole story.

    While this is a horrible tragedy, the population is not blaming guns, lack of gun restrictions, or even Sarah Palin for the event. There is also a very strong mood to oppose any further govt expansion in any area. Now that doesn't mean they won't try and jam anything down our throats, after all hardly anyone wanted Obamacare...but it certainly seems highly unlikely, esp with a more a conservative House.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Urban Cessmaze
    Posts
    4,054
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)

    Cool

    I actually switched to the 1911 towards the end of the AWB... from a S&W 1006.

    As for AR magazines? Why, I don't even KNOW how to spell "AR!"
    - Either you're part of the problem or you're part of the solution or you're just part of the landscape - Sam (Robert DeNiro) in, "Ronin" -

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,922
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hmac View Post
    Yeah, you're probably right. The almost total lack of current political furor and debate on the issue and the ongoing silence from the NRA pretty much tells the whole story.
    Now, the slimes at the VPC are condemning the NRA for refusing to speak out. If the NRA would have spoken out, these same pissants would be crying about that too.

    The NRA took the high road while they danced in the victims still-warm blood and it didn't work.

    I guess it is back to rolling winos to make the light bill at Brady and th eVPC.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    In the unlikely event of that scenario I'd probably stop buying new guns and would spend exclusively on ammo.

    Due to the last ban I have a minimum of 10 mags per gun, and in case of Glocks, ARs and AKs I have hundreds of them. When we got the sunset I basically purchased a lifetime supply.

    When certain mags like G3, AK and Uzi mags were incredibly cheap I bought several hundred of them. More than I will ever need and future trading stock if we ever do get a ban.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    KY
    Posts
    576
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I also don't believe this will pass....fingers crossed.

    I had the unfortunate pleasure of seeing a video of Rachael Maddow of pMSNBC interview Caroline McCarthey of NY (D). She's the one thats been reintroducing the assault weapon ban every year since '04. She's also the one that told Tucker Carlson on CNN after the Virginia Tech shooting that a barrel shroud is "this thing that goes up". Anyway, she and Maddow didn't say crap about assault weapons other than mentioning the original '94 ban. What they want is a just a ban on the magazines, and McCarthey said she wants no grandfather clause or sunset this time. From what she described it would be just like it is in CA. You keep what you have but your not allowed to give/sell them to anyone and if you die they must be destroyed.

    BTW: my choices also wouldn't change....Glock 9mms and Smith J frames.
    Last edited by cathellsk; 01-16-11 at 01:45.
    "When you go home, Tell them of us and say, For your tomorrow, We gave our today."

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •