Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Who Is Most Likely To Get Nuked Next...?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Who Is Most Likely To Get Nuked Next...?

    Given that sooner or later technology is available to anyone.

    60 years ago super computers costing ungodly sums now have less power than the ones we use to ask questions on the internet. Satellite communication devices which were once out of the question for many nations are now used by the average individual.

    And Hiroshima atomic technology really isn't that complicated and it is possible to get materials outside the normal channels. So we can guard the former Nato and Warsaw stockpiles all we want, sooner or later somebody will make one.

    So who is gonna be the first one to develop an unregistered nuke, and where is it gonna be deployed?
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia / Afghanistan
    Posts
    2,480
    Feedback Score
    54 (100%)
    My guess would be Pakistan, if the Islamists seize control and decide to get frisky with their own WMD's.
    SSG Jimmy Ide- KIA 28 Aug 10, Hyderabad, AFG

    1SG Blue Rowe- KIA 26 May 09, Panjshir, AFG.

    RIP Brothers

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,306
    Feedback Score
    0
    In this day and age, it's extremely impossible for major countries that have "da bomb" to pull the trigger unless a war has been drawn out for decades. A war between two superpowers is just not going to happen.

    So who is the most likely nation to get nuked? It will be a western country, guaranteed. However it won't be a traditional nuclear missle that strikes the country, but a dirty bomb instead, and will be delivered by islamic extremists.

    I suggest watching this video.
    http://www.vbs.tv/watch/the-vice-gui...an-dirty-bombs

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Wappinger, NY
    Posts
    1,219
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    The next nuke deployed will detonate in NYC or Israel, this is my best guess.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    39 (100%)

    I hope...

    It would be Switzerland. Never can trust those shady neutral bastards.
    Last edited by jklaughrey; 01-17-11 at 23:30.
    Never judge a man by his success, judge by how he deals with his failures!- L.E.C.

    Some People suck at being Human!- Me

    "To keep you is no gain, to destroy you is no loss."- Khmer Rouge

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    2,419
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Next places to get nuked?

    1. United States
    2. India
    3. Pakistan

    In that order.
    Last edited by Mac5.56; 01-17-11 at 23:42.
    Mobocracy is alive and well in America.*
    *Supporting Evidence for Hypothesis: The Internet
    -me

    'All of my firearms have 4 military features, a barrel, a trigger, a hammer, and a stock."
    -coworker

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    7488 ft.
    Posts
    2,458
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Israel first.
    Then Iran.
    Then Iran again.
    And again.
    And again.
    And again.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    907
    Feedback Score
    0
    India
    _________________________________________

    I understand too is an adverb and to is a preposition, I still prefer using to in place of too.

    The way I see it I'll save maybe 5-10 minutes over my lifetime not typing that extra o at the end of to. Even typing up this explanation saves me more time than typing that extra o


    Cheers,
    Mr. Smiles

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by kal View Post
    In this day and age, it's extremely impossible for major countries that have "da bomb" to pull the trigger unless a war has been drawn out for decades. A war between two superpowers is just not going to happen.

    So who is the most likely nation to get nuked? It will be a western country, guaranteed. However it won't be a traditional nuclear missle that strikes the country, but a dirty bomb instead, and will be delivered by islamic extremists.

    I suggest watching this video.
    http://www.vbs.tv/watch/the-vice-gui...an-dirty-bombs

    Not that I disagree with your premise. But we are talking about a nuke (doesn't have to be missile delivered), not a dirty bomb.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,770
    Feedback Score
    0
    If terrorists get enough weapons grade material [weapons grade being the key words here because it takes big permanent facilities to refine the raw materials to get weapons grade]. Most likely it would be passed to them or sold to them. From NK , Iran or any other country that doesn't like us. I would expect multiple targets most likely highly populated cites that are finical and high tech centers [IE large internet routing hubs] Would have the most impact to the country with the fewest number of bombs. The number could be as low as 3-5 cities would end the superpower status of the country.

    Will add: Thanks to Rhutch That the former Soviet union is also a potential source of materials and technical help from former engineers and scientists.
    Last edited by Thomas M-4; 01-18-11 at 19:56.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •