Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Who Is Most Likely To Get Nuked Next...?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    7488 ft.
    Posts
    2,458
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boss Hogg View Post
    If George W. Bush were still president, I would bet a significant sum that Mecca would have been wiped out if a nuke went off on US soil.

    That was thought to be his Damoclean sword in preventing another 9/11.

    Much cheaper and far more effective than TSA, color-coded threat levels, etc.
    Perhaps correct. But it would turn 1 billion muslims worldwide into fanatical tasmanian devils who would do a lot of harm. That would in turn give rise to Adolf Hitler, II, whose objective would be 'elimination of the muslim problem'. IMO

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    O-HI-O
    Posts
    376
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Boss Hogg View Post
    If George W. Bush were still president, I would bet a significant sum that Mecca would have been wiped out if a nuke went off on US soil.

    That was thought to be his Damoclean sword in preventing another 9/11.
    Makes some sense.

    I've always felt that this is why we never had another big incident when he was in office and due to the 2 war fronts taking up the enemies resources to an extent.

    I think the leaders of certain terrorist organizations are yes fanatical about their religion, but not stupid enough to have certain sites turned into dust if they step over the line.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,306
    Feedback Score
    0
    If extremist muslims did set off a nuke in the US, it is my opinion that the US would attempt an all out take over of select middle eastern countries.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,808
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by kal View Post
    If extremist muslims did set off a nuke in the US, it is my opinion that the US would attempt an all out take over of select middle eastern countries.
    Does that mean we will get cheap oil?
    Last edited by Cagemonkey; 01-18-11 at 15:32.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 500grains View Post
    That would in turn give rise to Adolf Hitler, II, whose objective would be 'elimination of the muslim problem'. IMO

    You say that like it's a bad thing.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    9,209
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    So who is gonna be the first one to develop an unregistered nuke, and where is it gonna be deployed?
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/myste...ry?id=12097155

    In all seriousness, I would say:

    Location: CONUS

    I'd gamble it would be China acting through a puppet organisation.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    7488 ft.
    Posts
    2,458
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    You say that like it's a bad thing.
    Like any bitter medicine, there could be unwanted side effects.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,248
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I'd say the most likely situation to pop off into a nuclear problem would be India/Pakistan.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,808
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    The probability of Iran having a nuclear exchange with Israel is pretty high. The Iranian Shia Zealots are even more dangerous than Al Quida. This guys believe in order to bring the 12th Imam(2nd coming of sorts) they need to create chaos and hell on earth in order to initiate his coming.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Outlander Systems View Post
    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/myste...ry?id=12097155

    In all seriousness, I would say:

    Location: CONUS

    I'd gamble it would be China acting through a puppet organisation.
    Doesn't their economy depend upon us shopping at Wal Mart?
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •