Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: 4" Significance?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    297
    Feedback Score
    1 (75%)

    Exclamation 4" Significance?

    Okay, I know I am going to get some smart comments about this question, but if I dont ask the question then I wont know the answer.
    How significant is the 4" difference between a 10.5" and 14.5" barrel. Beside for the obvious answer that the barrel is 4" longer. Will bullets of equal weight and size have a significant increase in velocity? Will accuracy be significantly increased? Will range be significantly increased? Additional information of the previous type is what I am looking for in an answer. What do I mean by significant. How about an increase of 25-35%. If this is unrealistic increase let me know.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Deep East Texas
    Posts
    612
    Feedback Score
    0
    You should probably post this question in the NFA section, but here are some velocities that I've measured from the barrels you mention (10.5" LMT & 14.5" Colt):

    77gr MK262:
    10.5" = 2293fps
    14.5" = 2579fps

    62gr XM855
    10.5" = 2610fps
    14.5" = 2940fps

    55gr XM193
    10.5" = 2745fps
    14.5" = 3091fps

    Velocities are 10-shot averages. Chrony was 10' from the muzzle. As you can see, the differences are fairly significant.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Eastern PA
    Posts
    696
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Rich has set you up well with the velocities, where that really comes into play is in the wounding potential of the round when it hits soft tissue.

    When the .223 round falls under 2650-2700 FPS it fails to yaw after hitting soft tissue and just makes a .22 hole rather then achieving it's full wounding potential. Of course this is also dependant on bullet type, but that's the short answer.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    297
    Feedback Score
    1 (75%)
    Quote Originally Posted by DRich View Post
    You should probably post this question in the NFA section, but here are some velocities that I've measured from the barrels you mention (10.5" LMT & 14.5" Colt):

    77gr MK262:
    10.5" = 2293fps
    14.5" = 2579fps

    62gr XM855
    10.5" = 2610fps
    14.5" = 2940fps

    55gr XM193
    10.5" = 2745fps
    14.5" = 3091fps

    Velocities are 10-shot averages. Chrony was 10' from the muzzle. As you can see, the differences are fairly significant.
    Thanks for the information. I will submit the question to the NFA thread and see if I get more answers.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    297
    Feedback Score
    1 (75%)

    4" Significance?

    Okay, I know I am going to get some smart comments about this question, but if I dont ask the question then I wont know the answer.
    How significant is the 4" difference between a 10.5" and 14.5" barrel. Beside for the obvious answer that the barrel is 4" longer. Will bullets of equal weight and size have a significant increase in velocity? Will accuracy be significantly increased? Will range be significantly increased? Additional information of the previous type is what I am looking for in an answer. What do I mean by significant. How about an increase of 25-35%. If this is unrealistic increase let me know.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Deep East Texas
    Posts
    612
    Feedback Score
    0
    As I posted in your other thread:

    Here are some velocities that I've measured from the barrels you mention (10.5" LMT & 14.5" Colt):

    77gr MK262:
    10.5" = 2293fps
    14.5" = 2579fps

    62gr XM855
    10.5" = 2610fps
    14.5" = 2940fps

    55gr XM193
    10.5" = 2745fps
    14.5" = 3091fps

    Velocities are 10-shot averages. Chrony was 10' from the muzzle. As you can see, the differences are fairly significant.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    956
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DRich View Post
    You should probably post this question in the NFA section, but here are some velocities that I've measured from the barrels you mention (10.5" LMT & 14.5" Colt):

    77gr MK262:
    10.5" = 2293fps
    14.5" = 2579fps

    62gr XM855
    10.5" = 2610fps
    14.5" = 2940fps

    55gr XM193
    10.5" = 2745fps
    14.5" = 3091fps

    Velocities are 10-shot averages. Chrony was 10' from the muzzle. As you can see, the differences are fairly significant.
    And while we're at it, you need to ealize that the terminal effects from a 16 " is aound 150 yards or so. Anything shorter just loses more expansion effectiveness.

    Choose wisely.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    297
    Feedback Score
    1 (75%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Joe R. View Post
    Rich has set you up well with the velocities, where that really comes into play is in the wounding potential of the round when it hits soft tissue.

    When the .223 round falls under 2650-2700 FPS it fails to yaw after hitting soft tissue and just makes a .22 hole rather then achieving it's full wounding potential. Of course this is also dependant on bullet type, but that's the short answer.
    So from the velocity chart it would make sense for me to get a 14.5"bbl in order to maintain sufficient velocity to achieve a better chance of a good wound. Thanks for your information, it was very helpful.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    297
    Feedback Score
    1 (75%)
    Quote Originally Posted by toddackerman View Post
    And while we're at it, you need to ealize that the terminal effects from a 16 " is aound 150 yards or so. Anything shorter just loses more expansion effectiveness.

    Choose wisely.
    So for best results I should shoot at targets around 150 yds or more to achieve the best expansion?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Deep East Texas
    Posts
    612
    Feedback Score
    0
    Don't put too much importance on the fragmentation range. It's certainly something you should consider, but the 5.56x45 can easily produce fatal wounds without fragmenting if you put the bullet in the right place. The fact that members of this forum have used 10.5" guns effectively at 300yds is a testament to that fact. I'm not saying you should consider a 10.5" rifle to be the best choice for 300yd work, but it's certainly capable if you're proficient with the platform.

    However, if fragmentation is your main concern with SBR's, then you should stick with the heavier bullets since they retain their fragmentation properties at lower velocities. For example, the 75gr TAP round will fragment around 2250fps compared to the typical 2700fps threshold quoted for M193/M855.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •