Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Federal 9mm Tactical Bonded 135+P LE9T5

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    182
    Feedback Score
    0

    Federal 9mm Tactical Bonded 135+P LE9T5

    This round keeps coming up as one of the most recommended 9mm defensive rounds but I can't find any ballistics or other type testing of it. What type of bullet does Federal use in this ? I doubt it's the HST as I think the round was developed before HST hit the market so I'm assuming it's a bonded version of the Hydra Shock. Can anyone confirm this or point me to some test data. I managed to find a few boxes at an Estate Sale and for the price couldn't pass it up.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    482
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    It is NOT a bonded HydraShok. I can tell you that much. Its almost like a bonded Hi-Shok. Becuase it used to be so hard for me to get, I never considered using it. I could only find a few boxes at a time. When I did shoot it, I found it to be extremely avvurate out of my old SIGs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    182
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks, it is a fantastic round. I put two boxes thru my P7M13 yesterday and it was very accurate and soft shooting for a +P round. It's weird as the boxes are just marked 135grn but the cases are all +P stamped. First time I have seen that.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    9
    Feedback Score
    0
    its a bonded hollow point round. the HST i believe isnt bonded(never used).

    anyway its on doc's list of g2g rounds, so he might be able to provide some info on testing.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Duty station here....duty station there...
    Posts
    661
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I've been using it on duty for quite a while. What testing I have seen, it seems to open up pretty reliably, slightly larger than the Gold Dot, and does well in barrier testing.

    I believe that Federal designed the bullet from scratch to be thicker around the nose to withstand windshield testing better. The one thing that really tears up the 9mm is the windshield test, because it sheds so much of the bullet around the thinner nose. I've found it to be very accurate as well. Ballistics wise, its more like shooting a standard pressure 147gr load.
    "A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." -Ecclesiastes 10:2

    Glock Armorer
    Sig Sauer Armorer
    Colt M16/M4 Armorer
    Remington 870/11-87 Armorer
    Firearms Instructor

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    362
    Feedback Score
    27 (100%)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    The Federal 135 gr Tactical works very well as noted below--it is one of the best 9 mm loads available.

    9mm Fed 135 gr +P JHP (LE9T5) from 4" S&W 5906, 5 shot ave:
    Bare: vel=1070 fps, pen=16.0", RD=0.58", RL=0.36", RW=126.6 gr
    Denim: vel=1067 fps, pen=16.3", RD=0.55", RL=0.45", RW=134.0 gr

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Allen, Texas
    Posts
    660
    Feedback Score
    0
    Doc,

    Do you have the windshield test numbers for this round?
    Colt's Manufacturing Company Armorer Instructor

    Aimpoint USA ProStaff

    www.hardwiredtacticalshooting.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    It was an older test that I don't have access to here at home, but I recall it going about 12" of penetration, expansion around 0.50", and it lost about 25 gr weight or so. Next time we shoot gel, I'll pop one through a windshield for you.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    161
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    How does this compare to the 124+p gold dot load?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •