which one should i get? or should i get neither? my price limit isnt great, only willing to spend $400
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
which one should i get? or should i get neither? my price limit isnt great, only willing to spend $400
I have no experience with that model of Remington except that they are ugly as hell and feel cheap.
I have owned several Savage rifles over the years, and all of them were well made, accurate rifles that gave me no issues.
My most current deer rifle is an impulse buy Savage .308 that I picked up at Cabelas a couple of months ago. Was one of the package deals with a 3X9 scope, synthetic stock, like $399 IIRC.
With Federal 150gr SP from a sandbagged prone it's a 1 1/4" gun. Although folks like to talk sub MOA, I find it's rather rare in real life, and that a low cost-no special effort taken 1"-1 1/2" gun is actually damn accurate when all the BS is boiled off.
The 770 is a pile of crap. The stevens is better, but not much better.
Save more money.
That is all.
For the Stevens 200, IIRC it's the same platform as a Savage 110, so you could build around it as you feel the need and have the dough. This seems to me a great starting point for someone on a severe budget.
However, I far prefer the 700, so I recommend shopping the sales and even looking for a gently used one, which you should be able to find for around $400. I got a camo ADL varmint with good bases, cheap rings and scope, from Di_k's last year for $450. Since then I've seen an SPS-V barely used for $450.
"Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge
.
Remington should be ashamed of offering the 710 and 770 as "variations" of their 700. Calling them crap is being nice.
I saw a new Remington 700 with a cheap Remington Scope at Wal-Mart for $429 this past Fall. I'm sure it wasn't up to the Remington 700 of old but it was a 700.
I'd buy a used beat up 700 before I bought the 770. I noticed several different used Model 700's for <$400 at the past few Gun Shows I've been to. I'd wait, the next few months are the best times to buy a deer rifle.
.
Last edited by ucrt; 02-04-11 at 11:57.
is the stevens a little bit better cause of the way its made or because its more accurate?
i might have to go with a different gun than listed, maybe just wait and b patient. its not like i dont have the money to buy a really expensive gun, its cause i just got my BCM a couple months ago and i dont like to spend so much so quickly unless im buyin a car.
Lets put price aside, what would b the best .308 rifle for the money it is?
Last edited by pbmaster2k89; 02-04-11 at 12:14.
I've had Remington dealers tell me that the 770 was a mistake. Personally, I'd keep saving and find a used 700.
By the way, your intended use will help this forum find suggestions for you.
Last edited by Chameleox; 02-04-11 at 13:23.
The advice above is worth exactly what you paid for it.
i refuse to buy used but ive seen 700's for 550 new. my intended use is target shooting but may use it for hunting. either way i want somethin accurate
Buy the Stevens if those are your two choices. It's a much better platform to build on.
When you have the money, buy a better stock. (~$200 - $750)
Then, later, when you have more money, buy a better trigger. (~$100)
Then, when you have burnt out the factory barrel, buy the tools to swap out the barrel (which is an easy DIY). (~$400)
Do those things, and you'll have a top notch budget rifle by the time you're done for ~$1,050 - $1,250 if you're judicious about part selection.
Mark
MOΛΩN ΛABE .... I Dare You!!
"An armed society is a polite society." – Robert A. Heinlein
Bookmarks