Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Ronald Wilson Reagan 1911-2011

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia / Afghanistan
    Posts
    2,480
    Feedback Score
    54 (100%)
    Sounds great in theory, but in application it won't work. If we don't project our power and influence, others will fill the void in our absence(Iran, Russia, China).

    Quote Originally Posted by Skyyr View Post
    The answer is simple: go back to isolationism, leave other countries alone and let them blow each other to bits, while we focus on fixing our own problems. If anyone attacks us, we nuke their country and everyone next to them.
    SSG Jimmy Ide- KIA 28 Aug 10, Hyderabad, AFG

    1SG Blue Rowe- KIA 26 May 09, Panjshir, AFG.

    RIP Brothers

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by chadbag View Post
    Today, politicians (of both parties) make decisions based on what is best for them and their parties, not the best for the country. That is one of the major differences.
    Exactly. Reagan was the last President who IMO tried to do what was best for ALL Americans and the country.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,056
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rickrock305 View Post
    I'm not saying Reagan created the problem. I'm saying his policies helped create the anti west extremism we are currently dealing with.
    This is what is commonly referred to as a distinction without a difference.

    Supporting Hussein was classic realpolitik and was probably the smart move. At the time. BTW I am not convinced the the US supported Saddam's actions at Halabja and elsewhere. WRT Iran Contra, I think that the general public will never know the true nature of the transactions. It might not have been the best move, but it was highly defensible given the circumstances.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,056
    Feedback Score
    0
    Rickrock- you mention 11 tax increases.

    What was the top marginal rate in Jan 1980? And in Dec 1988?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,554
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mattjmcd View Post
    This is what is commonly referred to as a distinction without a difference.

    Supporting Hussein was classic realpolitik and was probably the smart move. At the time. BTW I am not convinced the the US supported Saddam's actions at Halabja and elsewhere. WRT Iran Contra, I think that the general public will never know the true nature of the transactions. It might not have been the best move, but it was highly defensible given the circumstances.

    There is an excellent documentary about Reagan on HBO this month. Pretty much the good and the bad, and very in depth. I think Reagans motivation to secure the release of US hostages in Lebanon was his primary goal in the entire Iran-Contra affair.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •