I dont think crossfit should be for anyone.....
Wow, you totally refuted everything I just said. Well done.
All the people who have gotten great results with it don't matter then huh?
Don't be so closed minded, you might actually discover something that works well. You said you didn't "get it" so I'm trying to help you understand. What's the problem? Also please explain how I'm "short changing" myself by doing CF.
Last edited by Hobbes; 02-22-11 at 08:02.
I should not have used “full-retard” to describe CF-style kipping pull-ups in this context.
I do understand that CF-style kipping pull-ups serve a different purpose than slow, controlled, dead hang pull-ups. I have a chronic issue with one shoulder. Slow, controlled dead-hang pull-ups concern me on some days. I will not do CF-style pull-ups, because I am literally afraid of the consequences and they do not fit with my separation of cardio and strength training.
For those with legit shoulder issues, it probably is wise to steer clear of high rep kipping pullups...no worries there.
If your choice is to strictly separate cardio and strength that's great. I just hate it when I get judged for mixing them together...hey, LIFE mixes strength and cardio so why shouldn't my workout? It's been proven to work.
And just to clear up any other misconceptions, CF does separate them some days. There are pure strength days with heavy deads, squats cleans etc...and pure cardio days with 800m repeats, mile repeats, 5k, 10k, 15k or rowing.
What I think is interesting about CF (and programs like it) are that they aren't new, they've simply been given a name and context.
My experience stems from my time as an 0341 in the Marines (98-06). I had been doing some sort of functional excersice since first picking up with my victor unit. Lugging around a barrel, base plate and bipods was an ass kicker if you were just walking; pick up the pace a bit, throw in some crew serve drills here and there and you were in for some good, hard PT.
Once I hit my second enlistment, i got into the MCMA program as an instructor and then instructor/trainer, I found that much of the physical portion that wasn't technique driven was what you would now see in many CF gyms today. Sprints, body weight exercises, weighted compound exercises, combination short duration high exertion and long duration low exertion, pushing to failure, ect...
All that said, I definately think that CF has it's place. It, like many other things, is a useful tool to keep in mind if your looking to change up your workouts.
PS: However, I'm just never going to be OK with the kipping pull-ups...but thats just the Marine in me, more than anything else
"Locate, close with and destroy the enemy..."
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
I've already stated in this thread that just about every respected physical fitness org. states that for optimal gains in both strength/resistance, and cardiovascular training they need to be done seperate. (sorry you're late to the party)
I'm not closed minded, i just know what is a crap workout when i see one. If i can knockout a workout (for both strength and cardio) in less than 15mins.....i HIGHLY doubt its designed/structured well.
Crossfit is fragmented, and constantly OVERWORKS muscle groups. So ya, if you dont believe the body needs rest to grow/rebuild, keep breaking down your body with cf.
I also wouldnt get too excited about crossfitters doing great in PT tests. Most PT tests dont really test for real world function, as we've discussed.
Last edited by J-Dub; 02-24-11 at 09:20.
I don't know. Some of those Crossfit dudes/gals look to be in wicked shape.
Bookmarks