Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Jeopardy

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Culpeper, VA
    Posts
    6,313
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)

    Jeopardy

    IBM Challenge tonight. IBM's Watson Computer is challenging the two top Jeopardy players.
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,066
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutshot John View Post
    IBM Challenge tonight. IBM's Watson Computer is challenging the two top Jeopardy players.
    I just watched the NOVA special about that the other night. Pretty fascinating.
    "You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it helps if you have some kind of football team, or some nuclear weapons, but in the very least you need a beer."
    — Frank Zappa

    If the gun goes dry I use my knife. If the knife breaks off I use my teeth. I have only one rule - Start one job and see it through - The universe will have to offer someone else the leftovers. Multi tasking doesn't work in business or in gunfighting.
    - Michael de Bethencourt

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Niantic CT
    Posts
    1,964
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Looks like Watson did very well today.
    Certified Glock Armorer

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    6,100
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    It appeared to me as though Watson's principal advantage was the ability to "ring in" almost instantaneously regardless of whether it had fully processed the clue and formulated a response whereas both Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter had that slight, "human" hesitation when deciding whether to "ring in."

    The actual clues were, for the most part, not that difficult. Both of these guys kicked ass with material as tough, if not tougher, during their respective runs on the show. Looked like it was straight up reaction time that gave Watson the upper hand, processor, whatever.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,066
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by montanadave View Post
    It appeared to me as though Watson's principal advantage was the ability to "ring in" almost instantaneously regardless of whether it had fully processed the clue and formulated a response whereas both Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter had that slight, "human" hesitation when deciding whether to "ring in."

    The actual clues were, for the most part, not that difficult. Both of these guys kicked ass with material as tough, if not tougher, during their respective runs on the show. Looked like it was straight up reaction time that gave Watson the upper hand, processor, whatever.
    I wonder if that is part of the programming...say it reaches a certain amount of "confidence" in it's answer, like 80% certainty or whatnot, and buzzes based on that while it is still processing. I assume they would figure out a way to game it and make that a part of Watson's programming. I imagine it would make sense, since the guys working on the project have a lot at stake.
    "You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it helps if you have some kind of football team, or some nuclear weapons, but in the very least you need a beer."
    — Frank Zappa

    If the gun goes dry I use my knife. If the knife breaks off I use my teeth. I have only one rule - Start one job and see it through - The universe will have to offer someone else the leftovers. Multi tasking doesn't work in business or in gunfighting.
    - Michael de Bethencourt

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,248
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Fascinating stuff. The technology behind the process is amazing.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,821
    Feedback Score
    0
    They talked about this at church. Everyone was like IT CAN THINK!!!....... I was like no it can process spoken word. Same idea as all the computers in sci fi movies and books. It comes up with the answer because it has all that information stored on its drives like any other PC. It is just the interface that is different.


    They usually don't like me at church.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    8,191
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    SKYNET: I'll take "Eradicating Humans for $500, Alex."
    Last edited by ST911; 02-16-11 at 12:05.
    2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
    الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,546
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Skintop911 View Post
    SKYNET: I'll take "Eradicating Humans for $500, Alex."
    My thoughts exactly....
    Only hits count......you can not miss fast enough to catch up

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    965
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    I didn't get to watch but...


    Quote Originally Posted by dookie1481 View Post
    I wonder if that is part of the programming...say it reaches a certain amount of "confidence" in it's answer, like 80% certainty or whatnot, and buzzes based on that while it is still processing. I assume they would figure out a way to game it and make that a part of Watson's programming. I imagine it would make sense, since the guys working on the project have a lot at stake.
    Why would that be necessary?... And/or how would it be any different from what a human would be doing?

    I usually know the answers (the ones I do actually know) before either myself or Trebek finishes reading it.

    As far as reaction time the computer wouldn't need a head start to dominate it's human competition.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •