you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary

[Jerm]

So you do not think that a lawmaker urging union members to violence is worth discussing?

And how about the double standard of how harmless symbolism used by a conservative results in relentless vilification, but when a leftist urges actual violence, the mainstream press ignores it?

Nothing to discuss? ??

If every piece of dumb shit that a lefty says is going to be a discussion there won't be room for anything else.

This could easily be dismissed as metaphorical... Just because some idiots tried to blame Palin for a metaphorical piece means we should do the same?

If it's so discussion worthy than how come your original post was so lacking in content?

"Drive-by posting" comes to mind with most of your threads. A link and/or a short quote and off to starting the next thread. NTM they're soooo predictable

[RancidSumo]

So you do not think that a lawmaker urging union members to violence is worth discussing?

And how about the double standard of how harmless symbolism used by a conservative results in relentless vilification, but when a leftist urges actual violence, the mainstream press ignores it?

Nothing to discuss? ??

I think that when we already have had about 5000 threads about unions, double standards in politics, and stupid lawmakers. I'm sure that this could have fit into an existing thread since there is nothing really substantial in this thread.

Look at the thread, "Top or Interesting Economic and Political Articles". That is how you should handle posting dozens of links with very little to no original content of your own and very little to actually discuss.

[Sry0fcr]

I'll wade in... It's not the fact that you start threads, some actually quite interesting, it's that you start so many and so often. Some of the frustration people are exhibiting is due to this fact. You might possibly try to reevaluate what your criteria is for starting a thread and go from there. Best of luck!

This. No offense dude, but this ain't Twitter. Blogspot is free and you might even be able to cash in a little bit with adwords or something.

[500grains]

I'll wade in... It's not the fact that you start threads, some actually quite interesting, it's that you start so many and so often. Some of the frustration people are exhibiting is due to this fact. You might possibly try to reevaluate what your criteria is for starting a thread and go from there. Best of luck!

Well I don't want to overwhelm anyone with new threads. At the rate of 1 thread per day, I did not anticipate folks getting sideways.

[Belmont31R]

If you don't want to read something then don't. If you think someone is posting too much talk to a mod or site staff. I don't see the point in spamming his threads constantly complaining. If I don't want to read something I don't click on it. How hard is this?

[jwfuhrman]

I actually like seeing his posts, its a good read and interesting.

[rickrock305]

If you don't want to read something then don't. If you think someone is posting too much talk to a mod or site staff. I don't see the point in spamming his threads constantly complaining. If I don't want to read something I don't click on it. How hard is this?

This.

You know, personal responsibility and all.

As for the OP, its more of the hateful political rhetoric that unfortunately has become all too common. Instead of actually talking about problems and solutions, we get this drivel to whip up the base. Its really no better or worse than Palin's nonsense. Its all crap and all it does is further polarize the people to allow these nuts to consolidate their power.

[czydj]

I'm glad you post this stuff up and agree with the comments if you no likeee no reedeee...