Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: State Department spending tax dollars on foreign mosques...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)

    State Department spending tax dollars on foreign mosques...

    Hundreds of millions a year...billions quickly.



    Then people wonder how we are 14 trillion in debt. Shit like this. For for f-ing mosques in the middle east? Like those cocksuckers don't make money hand over fist on oil?



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaXuZ7ZWlOE

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    I almost forgot. In 2009 Obama sent almost a billion to Hamas for refugees in Gaza. Wheres the oversight report on how that billion was spent?



    Why are we sending billions of dollars to muslims?



    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...rew-c-mccarthy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,625
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Because the overriding urge of the Obama Administration is to make the Muslims like us, then maybe they won't attack us--say the handwringing leftists. Hence the conversion on NASA from a space exploration agency to a muslim outreach and enviornmentalist wacko convent. Leftists' religion is political correctness, and in the pantheon of political correctness, Muslims and their liking liberals is dear to the Liberal bleeding heart. Like Mark Steyn recently said "Muslims are the new gay." meaning that liberals will go to any lengths necessary, national sovereignty and the Constitution be damned, to pander to Muslims.
    Last edited by Cincinnatus; 02-23-11 at 19:02.

    "Addressing the problem of shootings by ban or confiscation of non-criminal's guns is like addressing the problem of rape by chopping off the Johnson of everyone who DIDN't rape anyone while not only leaving the rapists' equipment intact, but giving them free viagra to boot." --Me

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Outer Tumblungia
    Posts
    1,141
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Belmont31R View Post
    Wheres the oversight report on how that billion was spent?
    Here's your oversight report: lots of ordnance to be used against Israel, likely purchased from Iran.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,625
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RWK View Post
    Here's your oversight report: lots of ordnance to be used against Israel, likely purchased from Iran.
    Yes. Slowly but surely the Obama admin is lining itself up more and more with the Palestinians and against Israel. Note the recent declaiming by Secreatary Clinton that Israel building houses in their own frickin' country is illegitimate. It is only a matter of time before they openly say that Israel is the problem, not the Islamists, and ally with Israel's enemies--George Soros, who bank rolls much of what the DNC and the think-tanks Obama relies on for foreign policy, like Center for American Progress, has recently written in an OpEd that Israel is the problem. The Anti-semitic, Helen-Thomas heart of the Left will show through in time.

    "Addressing the problem of shootings by ban or confiscation of non-criminal's guns is like addressing the problem of rape by chopping off the Johnson of everyone who DIDN't rape anyone while not only leaving the rapists' equipment intact, but giving them free viagra to boot." --Me

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,808
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by winfield813@yahoo.com View Post
    Yes. Slowly but surely the Obama admin is lining itself up more and more with the Palestinians and against Israel. Note the recent declaiming by Secreatary Clinton that Israel building houses in their own frickin' country is illegitimate. It is only a matter of time before they openly say that Israel is the problem, not the Islamists, and ally with Israel's enemies--George Soros, who bank rolls much of what the DNC and the think-tanks Obama relies on for foreign policy, like Center for American Progress, has recently written in an OpEd that Israel is the problem. The Anti-semitic, Helen-Thomas heart of the Left will show through in time.
    Tonight, Glen beck mentioned the Billion worth of arms to Egypt in 2009. High probability these will be used against Israel, either by Egypt itself or given to Hamas.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Up state NY
    Posts
    3,037
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    I was in a civil affairs unit on my second enlistment and my team spent close to 400,000 in Afghanistan in 2003-2004 on trying to make Muslims like us. Most of the places we went had no freeking idea who we were so when we drove up and started handing out money and radios we were very popular.

    I spent alot of that money on mosques. There was also a program that would fly people to Meca for free for the Hage.

    It was a contest between the commanders to see who could spend the most.

    I dont think it worked

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    907
    Feedback Score
    0
    Separation of church & state. It's pretty clearly written...
    _________________________________________

    I understand too is an adverb and to is a preposition, I still prefer using to in place of too.

    The way I see it I'll save maybe 5-10 minutes over my lifetime not typing that extra o at the end of to. Even typing up this explanation saves me more time than typing that extra o


    Cheers,
    Mr. Smiles

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    493
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mr_smiles View Post
    Separation of church & state. It's pretty clearly written...
    Really? Where? The Constitution? The Bill of Rights? It's not clearly written into U.S. law if that's what you're implying. People are quick to quote that phrase, but it just isn't there. The 1st Amendment clearly states that Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion, or prohibit people from freely practicing their religion. Article VI prohibits a religious test as a requirement for holding government office, but "Separation of Church and State" is either a quote from a Supreme Court Justice, or from Jefferson's Danbury letter of 1802. It is not clearly written in U.S. law. The words "separation" and "church" don't appear in the U.S. Constitution at all.

    I'm not happy about all the wasted money we give to our enemies and to people and countries and religions that are gaming the system and will use it against us one day, but I do realize that we don't enforce most of the laws we already have on the books. I don't waste time worrying about not enforcing laws that aren't on the books.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Nevada
    Posts
    907
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by D. Christopher View Post
    Really? Where? The Constitution? The Bill of Rights? It's not clearly written into U.S. law if that's what you're implying. People are quick to quote that phrase, but it just isn't there. The 1st Amendment clearly states that Congress shall make no law regarding the establishment of religion, or prohibit people from freely practicing their religion. Article VI prohibits a religious test as a requirement for holding government office, but "Separation of Church and State" is either a quote from a Supreme Court Justice, or from Jefferson's Danbury letter of 1802. It is not clearly written in U.S. law. The words "separation" and "church" don't appear in the U.S. Constitution at all.

    I'm not happy about all the wasted money we give to our enemies and to people and countries and religions that are gaming the system and will use it against us one day, but I do realize that we don't enforce most of the laws we already have on the books. I don't waste time worrying about not enforcing laws that aren't on the books.
    To quote the supreme court.

    "The First Amendment has erected a wall between church and state. That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach."

    From Everson v. Board of Education Page 330 U. S. 18

    So any direct funding of a religious building is a direct violation of the first amendment, at least that's the opinion of the guys who decide whats constitutional for a living.
    Last edited by mr_smiles; 02-24-11 at 01:14.
    _________________________________________

    I understand too is an adverb and to is a preposition, I still prefer using to in place of too.

    The way I see it I'll save maybe 5-10 minutes over my lifetime not typing that extra o at the end of to. Even typing up this explanation saves me more time than typing that extra o


    Cheers,
    Mr. Smiles

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •