Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: What is the Prefered height for Aimpoint Micro LaRue Mount?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    910
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    What is the Prefered height for Aimpoint Micro LaRue Mount?

    What is the Prefered height for Aimpoint Micro LaRue Mount?

    The absolute co-witness



    Or the 1/3 lower co-witness?



    Have Fun, Be Safe

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    6
    Feedback Score
    0
    As with most things, it depends.

    Do you prefer your irons to show up in the middle of your red dot, or in the lower third?

    For me, I prefer my irons in the lower third. I have one carbine that has a fixed front sight, so I bought lower third for that one. I have others that are flip-up BUIS w/ Aimpoint. But because I use the same stock and desire the same cheek weld for training, I went lower third for them too.

    If all I had was flip-up BUIS, I would probably go absolute.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    910
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I should have done a poll.
    Have Fun, Be Safe

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    1,995
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    I do not understand absolute co-witness with AP Micro, but I think Grant stated that this is what most of his customers want - unless my memory serves me wrong.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    3,988
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    With CTR's and MOE's, I do run absolute cowitness with micro aimpoints. Using a folding front sight, it's not as much of a problem, and it's only because I tend to end up with my eye too low on even the iron sights, so that gives me the flexibility to shoot well from the prone.

    I still run lower 1/3 when using fixed sights and an EMOD or ACS stock, since my chin seems to ride that much higher.
    عندما تصبح الأسلحة محظورة, قد يملكون حظرون عندهم فقط
    کله چی سلاح منع شوی دی، یوازي غلوونکۍ یی به درلود
    Semper Fi
    "Being able to do the basics, on demand, takes practice. " - Sinister

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    I find the lower the optic the more firm of a cheekweld you have to the stock. This aides in minimizing parallax issues and consistency from shot to shot. The negative is during recoil its easier for your eye to drop out of the sights "eye box".


    A higher sight has a less firm cheek weld but allows quicker return to the eye box. For my 5.56 guns I mount my 1-4X scope in a 1.93" above rail height mount so when shooting on 1.1X I don't lose sight of the dot in 1.1X under recoil.


    Some of it depends on your facial shape, too.


    Last thing is an RDS and irons are two COMPLETELY different sighting systems. Don't buy into the lolipop shit some people spew. Thats the dot sitting on top of the front sight post creating a lolipop. The RDS does not need to be set on top of the front sight post. They are advertised as parallax free but are not. Just sit the gun down in a rest, and without touching the gun move your eye around. The dot will change position in relation to the target...ANA parallax. The RDS is a close in sighting system so even 1-2" parallax will not be a significant impact on rounds on target.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    11,706
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    I went with lower 1/3 because I have a fixed FSP.

    Quote Originally Posted by Belmont31R View Post
    They are advertised as parallax free but are not. Just sit the gun down in a rest, and without touching the gun move your eye around. The dot will change position in relation to the target...ANA parallax.
    At what distance? 5 yards? Yes. At 50 yards? I feel like it doesn't move at all, but 2" at 50 yards is the size of the dot, so its irrelavent.
    Last edited by Eurodriver; 04-03-11 at 23:51.
    Why do the loudest do the least?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eurodriver View Post
    I went with lower 1/3 because I have a fixed FSP.



    At what distance? 5 yards? Yes. At 50 yards? I feel like it doesn't move at all, but 2" at 50 yards is the size of the dot, so its irrelavent.

    100 yards.


    It matters if you put the dot in the same place each shot. Irrelevant doing drills.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    37
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I have a fixed front sight also. I did not like the lower 1/3 larue mount because I could not see my irons very well through the optic (aimpoint T1). I sold it and went with a absolute co-witness mount. I like it better. I feel more confident with it if I have to use irons. I shoot with both eyes open so the fixed front sight base is not that noticeable to me. I have become used to it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,187
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Belmont31R View Post
    Last thing is an RDS and irons are two COMPLETELY different sighting systems. Don't buy into the lolipop shit some people spew. Thats the dot sitting on top of the front sight post creating a lolipop. The RDS does not need to be set on top of the front sight post. They are advertised as parallax free but are not. Just sit the gun down in a rest, and without touching the gun move your eye around. The dot will change position in relation to the target...ANA parallax. The RDS is a close in sighting system so even 1-2" parallax will not be a significant impact on rounds on target.
    I advocate consistent cheekweld regardless of the sighting system being used, so the red dot will *always* be on top of the front sight post.
    Ken in Illinois

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •