Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Mag North shifting 40 miles per year

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,773
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Mag North shifting 40 miles per year

    Dang, this certainly means you need updated maps for magnetic declination. Holy shit 40 miles is a shit load of shifting.

    http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...,2819271.story

    EDIT: forgot to add this gives new meaning to "LBS" for sure you will be "loss bigger than shit!"
    Last edited by platoonDaddy; 02-21-11 at 17:06.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,422
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    What a relief. That explains why my land nav skills are so bad.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,773
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightvisionary View Post
    What a relief. That explains why my land nav skills are so bad.
    LOL, that is GREAT!

    For sure we would miss all the points.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,584
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    If I did my math right, and it's quite possible I didn't so if someone wants to check it, please do.

    40 feet lateral from north makes it 5456 miles rather than the 5400 miles from equator to north pole. I think that works out to about 0.01 degree angle change from equator to where the new magnetic north would be pointing you. That amounts to about 56 feet per 100 miles.

    Somebody check that. It doesn't sound right and I've been out of school for waaaay to damn long.
    Time flies when you throw your watch.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    163
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Too late in the evening for me to do the math, but here's NOAA's declination/Mag Var calculator:

    http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomagmodels/Declination.jsp

    It'll even account for date if you you want to trend it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,185
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    It's all those darn people in CHINA tipping over the crust of the earth with all that population and raw materials stockpiling...



    Rmpl
    "Our destruction... will be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence..."
    ...Daniel Webster, June 1, 1837

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    163
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rmplstlskn View Post
    It's all those darn people in CHINA tipping over the crust of the earth with all that population and raw materials stockpiling...
    Awesome!
    Mind if I use that during my LandNav lesson this class?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,773
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tortuga View Post
    Too late in the evening for me to do the math, but here's NOAA's declination/Mag Var calculator:

    http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomagmodels/Declination.jsp

    It'll even account for date if you you want to trend it.
    Great site, thanks for the link.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Stateside
    Posts
    100
    Feedback Score
    0
    That NOAA calculator is really cool; I had to share it with my friends. I wonder if there's a way to make an app that uses your GPS location and communicates with that jsp to give you an accurate declination on the go?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    87
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    I have been using the same MIM's for 6 years now along with a standard Lensatic Compass. I have set up several new Land Navigation courses spanning fron 1.5 to 28 kilometers (that I personally run before allowing my students to) and I have not noticed any shift in declination. Like I said same maps for years with the same GM angle.
    It must not be far enough to deviate from the desired course to matter. Even a Lensatic Compas that is +/- 3* is still considered good.

    Respectfully,
    USMC_0317_SS

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •