I like the idea of accuracy and precision. Groups are fine, but what we really want to know is what is the size of a target you can hit with what kind of confidence.
I made this myself (In Power point, that is why it might be a bit off since I just did it by eye). A half inch circle with +1/4in concentric circles and some black bands for aiming. The idea I'm thinking of is you shoot at the ten targets and mark down what is the smallest circle the shot hole clips. Mark it on the chart at the top. You can then look at the distribution of the chart and say you have a 9/10 chance of hitting a certian size target, or a 50/50 (5/5) chance of hitting a larger size.
I wanted to get away from just pure groups to what is really important, the ability to hit a target on demand. You could measure it from prone and other positions for a better estimate of what you'd actually hit. Prone, sitting and supported kneeling I think are three highly common and usable positions for accurate fire.
Just and idea.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks