Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 50

Thread: Stock options for 20" SPS Tactical (.308)

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    286
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ccoker View Post

    There's really nothing wrong with the HS, the gun shoots .5" at 300 yards.
    Your LTR shoots <0.17 MOA at 300 yards?!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    6,315
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 8200rpm View Post
    Your LTR shoots <0.17 MOA at 300 yards?!
    I'm guessing he meant 5.0" or 0.5' (6" or 2moa)

    If my rifle shot <0.17 MOA I'd be leaving that sucker in its current configuration.
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    A guy behind the gun store counter told me he shot 1/2" at 200 with his new LMT 308. What can you say?
    "Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    698
    Feedback Score
    49 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by carbinero View Post
    A guy behind the gun store counter told me......
    There should be a book with this as the title. Or perhaps something like:

    "A Guy Behind the Gun Store Counter Told Me......."
    (A compilation of fantasies, lies and other inconceivable bullshit)

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,022
    Feedback Score
    0
    I should clarify that is with carefully worked up handloads
    5 shots that can be completely covered with a dime at 100 yards
    Charles Coker

    Disclosure statement:
    Pro Staff - Silencer Shop
    Dealer - Armasight and Steiner Optics
    Affiliated with Trijicon, Wilson Combat and Crux Suppressors

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by tuck View Post
    If your shooting from bags, you should be fine. The only time I was able to get my old houge stock to flex up into the barrel was when I preloaded the crap out of my bi-pod.
    This is what I've kinda observed. I can push the front of the stock to where it'll touch the barrel... so I've opted to shoot off bags only.

    If I keep my pack close to the receiver, I can't see it being a problem.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    This is what I've kinda observed. I can push the front of the stock to where it'll touch the barrel... so I've opted to shoot off bags only.

    If I keep my pack close to the receiver, I can't see it being a problem.
    I stiffened the forend with MarineTex, relieved to plenty of gap, and that problem went away. A less expensive option would be 2 part epoxy from a hobby shop.
    "Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,948
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    So did you notice accuracy issues or just that it touched the barrel?
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sorry I can't tell you scientifically, since I added weight to the buttstock at the same time (also epoxied in a side swivel and modded the grip). Accuracy did improve, but I can't say whether it was only due to the forend stiffening or the ergo improvement as well. I use a 13-25" Harris for hunting in the high desert foothills, so that further diminishes the scientific control, in comparison with using a 6-9 for example.

    ETA: if you were asking if I noticed diminished accuracy with the bipod versus off the bags, I also can't give you a scientific answer, since it had only 200 rounds or so through the new factory barrel when I bedded, so it was still breaking in. I knew the stock would need stiffening or replacement, so not worth testing before and after, to me.
    Last edited by carbinero; 06-14-11 at 20:13.
    "Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Granite state of mind
    Posts
    84
    Feedback Score
    0
    Really like the Epoxy idea, wish I had though of that.

    Shot mine for a year and a half before I noticed on very warm days the stock flexing enough to touch. I too had read about the stock flexing and had kept a very close eye on it. Thought I had gotten lucky and ended up with a stiffer stock until the 90+ degree range day. I ended up going the B&C light tactical route.

    Can honestly say that I haven't been able to beat my previous best group with the replacement stock yet but I thoroughly enjoy working up various hand loads. The factory over mould will support 1/2" 100yd groups, even with out handloads(think Federal GMM), which is really more thank anyone can ask of a $500-600 rifle

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •