
Originally Posted by
rsilvers
And what if you tested 250,000 of the parts, and none of them failed MPI? But also what if your CMM machine found that 1.8% of trigger parts were bad - but you could still not test 100% of trigger parts due to time/budget?
Would you keep on testing MPI, or spend that same money on a second CMM to double the number of dimensions you could check on the trigger parts to further weed out the bad ones?
Well, if the internet demanded that you do 100% MPI, then you may skip buying the second CMM and keep on doing the 100% MPI. But if you were truly quality oriented rather than marketing driven, you would do whatever weeded out the most bad parts.
Bookmarks