How very typical of the US .gov
PMags rock and are alredy developed from private funds and proven.
They need to buy those, test 'em the .mil way and they would have saved tons of money they could have been used to buy even more mags
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How very typical of the US .gov
PMags rock and are alredy developed from private funds and proven.
They need to buy those, test 'em the .mil way and they would have saved tons of money they could have been used to buy even more mags
So USGI mag's (aluminum) are no longer the hot set up ? this could be a big change for me ,I always thought the standard USGI mag" worked fine . It's a brave new world .![]()
WHO ME ? ---- A government big enough to
give you everything you want, is
strong enough to take everything
you have.
-- Thomas Jefferson
Every time I see this thread I want to decapitate a pogue.
Anger sharks are swimming in my head.
Does anybody here recall the Beretta made M16 magazines?
I thought they were a perfect example of what they should be?
Though I'm not sure if they ever went into full production as I've only ever seen 1 in a friend's magazine collection. It was all steel, almost fully enclosed, and even had a anti tilt steel follower.
I wish I would have purchased it in hind sight.
Sure, why not. The info I said is well known in the forums and industry.
First and foremost, this is about a tax payer money waste and second having our ideas and patents violated.......again.
By the way, $98,790 would buy 6608 non windowed PMAG's at full retail.
Magpul bonehead
Bookmarks