Any advantage in the long run over a QD mount?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Any advantage in the long run over a QD mount?
After taking a class where there was plenty of rain and fog I am now sold on the idea of sticking with a QD mount. My Aimpoint Micro lenses got so covered in rain water and fog that I could no longer see my red dot and was unable to clearly see my irons once deployed. The only way I could continue our drills on the 300yd pop up range was by being able to remove my Micro due to being mounted on a Larue QD mount. While that weather situation was not the norm it did show me what could happen so I would rather be prepared for it.
I am of the opposite opinion, having shot in pretty heavy rain and never encountered an issue with seeing through the optic.
My only use for throwlever mounts now is for the optics I mount on loaner guns as well as the fact that there are so few quality fixed mounts.
Rained pretty good in this class (hence the rain coat, obviously not raining in this pic) and never had an issue that I recall.
(LT lower 1/3 mount here, changed to DD fixed mount after this class)
![]()
Last edited by rob_s; 06-22-11 at 09:16.
I was a bit surprised when it happened as were others in the class, however the instructor said that it was possible in the right conditions. The rain was so heavy that it made it tough to see the dot so many of us first resorted to covering the front lens however that didn't all that well either once the ready lenses started getting some fog from our breathing and the steam coming off the guns. Keep in mind this was not simply a CQB set up where targets were up and close. We were shooting at targets ranging from 25m out to 300m on a pop up range where they were only exposed for a few seconds. These were high round count drills so the guns were smoking pretty good. Like I said, I guess all of this factors kinda added up to present the visibility issue because I had never had an issue previously.
Just the normal vacillation before hitting order on a micro package. I like what I read on the ADM lever mount - ruggedness and ability to dismount and hold zero. But... like the looks, simplicity, and another SMALL weight savings on the DD mount - especially on my DD M4.
I was hoping to be able to MAYBE hook up the ADM mount without riser also on an Ultimak AK, but Grant (G&R) said that I'd need another mount - oh well.
So... DD still in play. Thanks all.
I have witnessed exactly the same thing in the rain. I was at a class where it rained pretty hard and guys simply could not see through their Micros. The ones that had QD mounts removed them and shot with irons. The guys with non-QD mounts were stuck trying to wipe the lenses off constantly.
Of course, as a soldier, I've been in conditions where I had to take my glasses and or goggles off, because of freezing rain/sleet was actually caking as it hit. Central Europe can bite. Good point.
Yeah the day it happened to me the conditions were bad enough that it affected everyone to include Micros, Aimpoint CompM4, Eotechs, and a Trijicon TR24. I really do like the DD fixed mount for its simplicity and have built 2 rifles using them, however after my experience in that training class I've decided to stick to high quality QD mounts like Larue.
I've seen very good comments on the ADM also.
Bookmarks