
Originally Posted by
Littlelebowski
However, we all know in reality that no such 1911 exists, regardless of cost.
You seem to be very good at regurgitating Larry's thoughts when you think they buttress your points. It doesnt bother you that those of us that have actually trained with Larry are all saying the same thing and it's the opposite of what you say?
You have a point that producing ultra accurate 1911's is expensive but to say 1911's that can hold 2" group at just 25 yards don't exist.....that's absurd. Have you been exposed to anything outside rack grade tactical guns?
One of my Bullseye guns that I had made tested out of a ransom rest a 1 5/16" at 50 yards with Federal Gold Medal. I'm starting to realize that some of people on this site are not familiar with many of the "traditional" shooting sports but there are dozens of pistol smiths that can build 1911's like that. It cost me $1200 in 2002. (and please...I'm not implying this gun would run in a middle eastern desert). Thats what a 1911 is capable of. If you could do that off the Glock platform they would be using them at Camp Perry.
I understand the limitations of 1911(for me thats mainly cost) and I'm currently researching for a modern service pistol. If you know of a modern polymer pistol that can old 2" at just 25 yards in .45 please let me know. I will probably buy it.
As for LAV, I put the quotes up because some people claim he says certain things that sometimes are in contradiction to what he says on his shows on on his website. Since "I" didn't say anything I'm not bothered at all.
I am more interested than ever now to attend a LAV course to see what he says about things. I have a formal training class Sunday but discussing the mechanical accuracy potential and mechanical design characteristics has zero to do with how much training I have had.
Last edited by OldState; 06-24-11 at 10:45.
"A flute without holes, is not a flute. A donut without a hole, is a Danish." - Ty Webb
Bookmarks