While I agree that Magpul walks on water, I would not wait for them to develop a product when a perfectly fine one that is clear bodied is available now -- Lancer. Perhaps I've missed something, but I don't recall reading a thread where Lancers were run and found deficient in a realistic test of what you, Joe Average, does with his/her mags.
You defeat a competitive market when you don't support the manufacturer who supplied what you need first. If Magpul loses sales because it's not competitive, so be it. It wasn't a priority for them.
It is very much in civilians' best interest to not become wedded to only one supplier, who may suddenly discover that its governmental customers don't want civilians to own the particular item, like a high capacity mag. Just look at who won't sell stuff to civilians or prices them so high no one can afford it (SCAR??). Also look at California -- what that market does drives a lot of decisions commercially.


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks