Surefire 7.62 MINI

[vereceleritas]

Not my video, but 762 mini on 300 blk.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uIEGXgXtBUY


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He had a lot of stoppages in just one magazine.

The Mini sounded good but YouTube vids aren't the best way to judge suppressors.

I'm pretty much stuck in the 556RC or 762 Mini debate myself. Might just end up getting both instead of a 762RC in the future.

[El Cid]

Anyone have a comparison review or even side by side photos of the SF 762 Mini and the KAC CQB/QDC in 7.62. One of those will be my next can. Outer dimensions seem very close. The advantage of the SF can is that I can use it on my 2 5.56 rifles that have SF muzzle devices.

[vereceleritas]

I don't believe any of the QDC cans have it made it to dealers yet. They're still waiting on the Form 3's.

[jonconsiglio]

Anyone have a comparison review or even side by side photos of the SF 762 Mini and the KAC CQB/QDC in 7.62. One of those will be my next can. Outer dimensions seem very close. The advantage of the SF can is that I can use it on my 2 5.56 rifles that have SF muzzle devices.

No, but I handled both at SHOT. The KAC is around an inch shorter.

I was pretty much set on the 762 mini, then I handled the KAC. Well, my problem with it is the size of the muzzle devices. The flash hider and MAMS from KAC for the 7.62 are 3" and 3.25" long and about 5 or 6 ounces. I don't use brakes that much, and would go with the flash hider. The 7.62 mounts are 2.8" as well.

My 9" AAC of course came with a blackout mount which is 1.75" long and about 4 ounces. AAC is coming out with the mini7, which will be in between the length of the smaller KAC 7.62 and the Surefire 762 mini, something like 5.5" or so and it's pretty cheap compared to the others.

While I prefer Surefire, for my particular use, the AAC might be the best option, I just have to wait a good 6 months for it to become available. That's fine if that's accurate.

The reason the mounts Re an issue for me is that my main use for this rifle will need to be unsuppressed. I started using it because of it's size and this 9" rifle has less blast than my 11.5" 5.56. So, I don't want to add 1.5" to it just so I can use a suppressor on my time. If I could suppress it all the time, I really think I'd go with the KAC.

[vereceleritas]

I was giving the KAC 762 QDC serious consideration until I found out that it would not mount to their 556 muzzle devices. That's a big hit on versatility for a suppressor that costs as much as it does. Of course it would be nice to get the matching 556 QDC as well but that's almost $3k tied up in two suppressors. I just need to win the lottery already.

[WS6]

I was giving the KAC 762 QDC serious consideration until I found out that it would not mount to their 556 muzzle devices. That's a big hit on versatility for a suppressor that costs as much as it does. Of course it would be nice to get the matching 556 QDC as well but that's almost $3k tied up in two suppressors. I just need to win the lottery already.

IMO the 5-6oz mount is the killer. That removes the weight advantage it held over the SF can.

[domestique]

IMO the 5-6oz mount is the killer. That removes the weight advantage it held over the SF can.

I would only go KAC if I planned on running the gun equally unsuppressed as I would suppressed. The you get the full benefit of the MAMS.

I personally went surefire RC.