Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Applicability of pistol training to carbine use?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    434
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    Great responses and thanks for the food for thought.

    I've been doing some additional thinking and I'm curious as to what makes an effective gunfighter. I can come up with six different elements -
    1. Gun/gear
    2. Mindset
    3. Physical condition
    4. Tactics
    5. Shooting skills
    6. Gunhandling skills
    7. Training/practice
    8. Critical thinking

    Am I missing anything here?

    I don't know which element(s) take priority, but my gut feeling is that the gun is most important, followed closely by mindset. As Jeff Cooper so succintly put it, "Remember the first rule of gunfighting...have a gun." Fortunately this is the easiest element to fulfill. With regards to mindset, I think that if you're not willing to fight, then what's the point of having a gun? The problem is how to cultivate the proper mindset, or warrior spirit if you will.

    The other elements I am less sure of. But I have the feeling that if you have the proper mindset, these four will naturally follow given time, training, and practice.

    What say you?
    Last edited by Johnny Rico; 07-20-11 at 20:09.
    "One can lead a child to knowledge, but one cannot make him think."
    - Robert Heinlein

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,328
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Rico View Post
    I've been doing some additional thinking and I'm curious as to what makes an effective gunfighter.
    Experience and discipline.

    However, you aren't a gunfighter until you have been in a gunfight.
    Don't take that as an insult, be content with being a well-prepared shooter. I know disciplined and prepared "shooters" I would take over hundreds of "gunfighters" that earned that title due to survival of a shootout more than any other factor.

    Step 1- hit what you are aiming at and know your limitations.
    Step 2- push those limitations

    Everything else will fall in line.
    When the student is ready, the master will appear.
    Jack Leuba
    Director of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Rico View Post
    I've been doing some additional thinking and I'm curious as to what makes an effective gunfighter. I can come up with six different elements -
    1. Gun/gear
    2. Mindset
    3. Physical condition
    4. Tactics
    5. Shooting skills
    6. Gunhandling skills
    7. Training/practice
    8. Critical thinking

    Am I missing anything here?

    I don't know which element(s) take priority, but my gut feeling is that the gun is most important, followed closely by mindset. As Jeff Cooper so succintly put it, "Remember the first rule of gunfighting...have a gun." Fortunately this is the easiest element to fulfill. With regards to mindset, I think that if you're not willing to fight, then what's the point of having a gun? The problem is how to cultivate the proper mindset, or warrior spirit if you will.

    The other elements I am less sure of. But I have the feeling that if you have the proper mindset, these four will naturally follow given time, training, and practice.

    What say you?
    Try not to pave new roads where there is already a super-highway to get you where you want to go.

    http://www.morr-con.com/combattriad.html

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by YVK View Post
    I know that this goes against general opinion, but I've not found much of carry-over from pistol to carbine. Yep, carbine is more forgiving in regards to trigger control, but there is more to shooting - both pistol and carbine - than trigger control, with entirely different host of challenges for each weapon system.
    What do you mean by "carry over". What you post goes exactly opposite to what I've observed at our drills nights. If I can get a proficient pistol shooter, explain holdover to him, show him where the buttons are, and over the course of a couple of hours offer some pointers, I usually end up with a pretty proficient carbine shooter.

    As I posted above, I differentiate between a carbine shooter and a rifle shooter. Since most classes these days are really just pistol classes with a carbine, the carryover is even more stronger.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    434
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    However, you aren't a gunfighter until you have been in a gunfight.
    Don't take that as an insult, be content with being a well-prepared shooter. I know disciplined and prepared "shooters" I would take over hundreds of "gunfighters" that earned that title due to survival of a shootout more than any other factor.
    Noted. And I don't want to be a gunfighter. My hope is to never have to use my guns for serious purposes. I would be well content if I spent the rest of life just shooting my guns for fun.
    "One can lead a child to knowledge, but one cannot make him think."
    - Robert Heinlein

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    2,044
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    What do you mean by "carry over". .
    I mean that technical challenges are too different, imo. Even mechanics of shooting is different, considering differences in arm position, wrist position and tension etc.

    With pistol, the trigger control and anticipation are huge so actual shooting is difficult.

    With 8-lbs .223 carbine equipped with 4 lbs trigger, neither trigger control nor anticipation are much of a big deal. Whether person is pistol-proficient or not, most people have little trouble pulling AR's trigger without taking sights out of alignment or flinching. With AR, the biggest issues - in my opinion - are manipulations and support arm strength and skill. Neither have much similarity with pistol manipulation or support hand demands.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    434
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    Try not to pave new roads where there is already a super-highway to get you where you want to go.

    http://www.morr-con.com/combattriad.html
    Thanks for that.
    "One can lead a child to knowledge, but one cannot make him think."
    - Robert Heinlein

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE FL
    Posts
    14,147
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I think that most proficient pistol shooters are also intelligent pistol shooters. I haven't seen anyone that I would consider "good" with a pistol that hasn't evaluated WHY they do things the way they do vs. just doing what they are told.

    This is where that two hour block of guidance comes in. I wouldn't even call it instruction. If I get a guy out that I know is a good pistol shooter but hasn't spent any time with a carbine, I simply let him do what he thinks is natural and provide advice from there. There are some basic things he may need to have explained, and IMO they go in this order:
    1. lower-level manual of arms (trigger, safety, bolt release, CH, load/unload)
    2. Sight above bore offset
    3. higher-level manual of arms (speed load, tac load, etc.)

    and it doesn't even take constant 1:1, these things can be ingrained in passing after the initial familiarization training ("put your hand here" or "hit this with your thumb not your finger" etc.).

    IME, it's not about any of this though, it's about understanding the higher order concepts. A proficient pistol shooter understands these things, and can easily adapt them to the carbine. Stance, mitigating the effects of recoil, target transitions, etc.

    FWIW, I am not basing this off of my own experience going from pistol to carbine, I'm basing it off of my experience helping others go from one to the other.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    40
    Feedback Score
    0
    I've had pistol courses, a shotgun course, and a carbine course. I've never carried a firearm for a living. Mine is a docile and typical life. Nevertheless, I've been shot at a few times (I was the unmistakable target).

    A couple of months ago my three young (ages 8 to 11) sons twisted my arm and made me take them and a couple of friends to the local paintball park. It was my first trip to such a place in twenty years. Being so young my sons and their friends were made to stay on my team. We played against teenagers with ticked out personal guns. The teenagers appeared to go paintballing alot. The judge (rangemaster of sorts) required the teenagers to use semi-auto settings rather than FA. Still, we were outgunned to a man.

    As an academic exercise I asked myself, "Self, what would you do IF you really had too defend these kids." Answer one was, "I would use my sights." (Interestingly, sights on a paintball gun are virtually useless.) Answer two was, "Get inside their OODA loop, one at a time, as quickly as prudence allows." Answer three was, "Flank them and roll them up, getting inside the OODA loop of each as quickly as prudence dictates.

    We won most of the time despite our disadvantages. In the paintball scenario situational awareness and expoitation of the teenagers' OODA loop proved very effective. I think the same would have been the case if we were using paintball pistols or paintball ballpeen hammers.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    146
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I've only taken 2 carbine classes. Carbine 1 was at a 20-yd indoor range and Carbine 2 was out to about 50yds, with the vast majority of the shooting within 25yds.

    Based on these training conditions, I almost see the carbine as a big pistol. I'd be keen to find a carbine (not precision rifle) class that focused specifically on 50-200 yards and plan to start exploring this middle ground on my own in the meantime.

    Lately I've introduced a friend of mine from our local club matches to the AR. He is a relatively new, very competent, ambitious and mostly self-taught pistol shooter. He is analytical by nature and by profession, but drawing on his pistol skillset, he quickly applied stance, grip, reset, manipulations, and other fundamentals to carbine. The RDS (EoTech) was new to him but intuitive to use.

    I don't know if carbine skills translate "down" to pistol as well. Something Chris Costa taught in a class once made me think: regarding transitions to pistol, he noted the difficulty in moving quickly from a 9lb carbine with a 5lb trigger to a 1.5lb pistol...with a 5lb trigger. From about 15yds (may have been 12), he had us do a man-on-man drill where we put 4x carbine rounds on each of four 8" targets, then transition to pistol and do 2x hits on each target. He called it, but almost every student in the class missed only 1 shot: the first shot with the pistol.
    Last edited by tradja; 08-04-11 at 03:31.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •