You're overcompensating dude and you're letting it get to you. Your tests are meaningless. But by all means enlighten us as to your methodology? What is N? What's your mean and median? Std deviation? MOE?
You can believe your own nonsense if you wish, but it's pure bluster.
You'd be seriously delusional if you think I don't have better things to do than watch your YouTube diarrhea. You're overcompensating thinking that somehow more videos means you're better.
Again your overcompensating. You want this to be a dick measuring contest and once again you're delusional if I'm going to play your kindergarten games.
Are you really that dull that you think that even if you had more training classes that it automatically makes you a better shooter? I've seen you shoot...it's on the videos you provided. I've got nothing to worry about but if you really want a solid metric to prove that come to PA and shoot against me. You pick the guns, I'll pick the course of fire.
Ugh, I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent. YOU'RE PROVING MY POINT. Yes they can zero, but if you really think you're going to be counting out 1/4 MOA clicks in the heat of a firefight (on anything other than a square range) you're less competent than I thought. There is comparatively little positive feedback with the clicks. You're not quickly returning to zero, I just keep turning it until I get to that point. If you think you're going to be gingerly removing and replacing caps in hot/cold weather, with someone shooting at you, you're a moron. It isn't a combat scope...it's a gamer scope and it's not operator error when NOT A SINGLE MILITARY UNIT USES IT. It simply isn't suited to the task at hand. How does that equate to an RDS killer or a "game changer".
Do you seriously have trouble reading english or are you just that stupid? The above statement is disingenuous bullshit. Are you really so full of yourself that you somehow think that just because someone came to a different conclusion than you did and doesn't like the optic in which you've placed so much emotional investment that they somehow haven't trained enough on them?
Funny that you should mention Daniel Horner, I'm friends with his Daniel's parents and VERY CLOSE FRIENDS with the guy that taught him how to shoot when he was 13 years old...in fact he's not only one of my best friends but he's also my shooting coach. His name is D.R. Middlebrooks. My wife and I go on vacation there to shoot and take classes with him 4-5 times a year. Ouch? Did that hurt? It should dumbass.
Here they are...
http://www.tacticalshooting.com/learn-more
I'm not knocking competitors at all but you're silly if you think that invoking their name gives you any kind of authority to speak on their behalf. Other competition shooters disagree with him, others who actually kill people for a living disagree with him also. More importantly what works for him may not work for another. He may be a great shooter but it doesn't mean you or anyone else has to burp his sperm.
There is no "one-size-fits-all" and that's as true for optics as anything else.
I'll choke up the rest to your inanity. Believe what you want, I'm out if someone wants to believe your idiocy that's on them.
Bookmarks