Page 23 of 33 FirstFirst ... 132122232425 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 321

Thread: Learning irons before optics; must we?

  1. #221
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    Great point. If you don't have to worry about target acquisition, you can focus on learning breathing, trigger control, etc. Then, add back in the sighting. AND, if the new shooter is enthused, he/she is much more likely to continue.
    "Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge

  2. #222
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    80
    Feedback Score
    0
    I hear the argument that irons don't run out of batteries and rarely ever fail. These are the reasons given for not running optics. For me, I'm cheap. I'd rather buy more things that go bang.

    One day I will buy a sweet acog knockoff that belongs on airsoft for the Larue I'm saving my pennies for, lol. (Kidding, I would NEVER disgrace that rifle!)

  3. #223
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    1
    Feedback Score
    0

    Fundamentals

    All too often I see people(to include Soldiers), want to throw an optic on their weapon to "make them more accurate". Consistently performing perfect fundamentals makes you accurate. If you don't understand the fundamentals of marksmanship, then adding more bells and whistles to your weapon will probably just magnify any errors, especially magnified optics since there are so many things that go into using an optic properly. There is a reason that the Army has students in the Squad Designated Marksman course shoot for a week with irons from 100y-600y before ever throwing on the ACOG. And if you don't pass irons you go home. Back in 06, 14 of 31 went home after week one.

    KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid. Master the basics, or atleast the level of accuracy you desire, before throwing on an optic.

  4. #224
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,965
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ReconSDM View Post
    All too often I see people(to include Soldiers), want to throw an optic on their weapon to "make them more accurate". Consistently performing perfect fundamentals makes you accurate. If you don't understand the fundamentals of marksmanship, then adding more bells and whistles to your weapon will probably just magnify any errors, especially magnified optics since there are so many things that go into using an optic properly. There is a reason that the Army has students in the Squad Designated Marksman course shoot for a week with irons from 100y-600y before ever throwing on the ACOG. And if you don't pass irons you go home. Back in 06, 14 of 31 went home after week one.

    KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid. Master the basics, or atleast the level of accuracy you desire, before throwing on an optic.
    I learned on irons but frankly in this day and age making students learn irons before optics is just a waste of time. Your right if shooters don't have a fundamental base they will not shoot well regardless of what they throw on the rifle. However you don't need to learn that base on irons that is an antiquated notion.
    Pat
    Serving as a LEO since 1999.
    USPSA# A56876 A Class
    Firearms Instructor
    Armorer for AR15, 1911, Glocks and Remington 870 shotguns.

  5. #225
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ReconSDM View Post
    ... adding more bells and whistles to your weapon will probably just magnify any errors, especially magnified optics ....


    Using good optics will make you more accurate, all other things being equal. That is why I think the statement quoted here is simply not true. If you can see the target better and faster, how can that be bad?
    "Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge

  6. #226
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Sneads Ferry, NC
    Posts
    76
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by carbinero View Post


    Using good optics will make you more accurate, all other things being equal. That is why I think the statement quoted here is simply not true. If you can see the target better and faster, how can that be bad?
    Unless you don't understand your wobble zone in non supported positions, and you snatch the trigger when you think your magnified optic is in the exact center of the target.
    Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both.

  7. #227
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,953
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by carbinero View Post
    If you can see the target better and faster, how can that be bad?
    One can not see "faster". Light travels way to fast for the human eye to detect that monumentally insignificant difference.

    You can see the target better/clearer though.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  8. #228
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Keydet08 View Post
    Unless you don't understand your wobble zone in non supported positions, and you snatch the trigger when you think your magnified optic is in the exact center of the target.
    "All things being equal," including amount of training time, you'd be better on the optic, even if it doesn't make you see faster.
    "Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge

  9. #229
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    32,953
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by carbinero View Post
    "All things being equal," including amount of training time, you'd be better on the optic, even if it doesn't make you see faster.
    Depends on the shooting... I mean... there are certainly times when a magnified optic is preferred.

    When we get out to 4 and 5 hundred yards, I'd be lying to you if I said I didn't like an ACOG or a 1-6.5, etc.

    From contact to around 150 or 200 yards... I don't want that crap in the way at all.
    "What would a $2,000 Geissele Super Duty do that a $500 PSA door buster on Black Friday couldn't do?" - Stopsign32v

  10. #230
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    What about Aimpoint vs irons? I know it's impossible to go back in time, but what if you were trained on optics instead of on irons? How about for average Joe who has limited training time...which way will make him faster and more accurate...sooner?
    "Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge

Page 23 of 33 FirstFirst ... 132122232425 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •