
Originally Posted by
rsilvers
I did detailed tests with a camera on manual exposure, and then had software measure the luminosity of the flash by summing the brightness of the pixels. The Surefire had as much as 25% more flash than a Vortex. No doubt if you had certain ammo with flash inhibitors or a longer barrel it would appear the same to the eye under non-controlled circumstances -- but I would not consider it an equal-performance flash suppressor to a Smith Vortex.
Really nice looking rifle. What front sight is that?
Good thing we aren't fighting against androids yet.
I believe you Robert, as always, but your data just gets a little too involved and doesn't take into account the human element.
Is 25% more than a standard vortex visible to the human eye? No? Well then keep it to yourself.
ZGXtreme was asking about it's usefulness in the real world, not imaginary world.
But then again, it's made by a competitor of yours so you might as well provide all evidence that it's sub par.
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball...
Bookmarks