
Originally Posted by
JohnnyC
Aside from the aesthetics which I think are just goofy, I don't like that the attachment method is part of the holster body. That stuff breaks, with an RCS/similar you can just swap the loops, this puts you completely out of action.
Well, from the aesthetics standpoint, I kind of like it. Aesthetics are entirely subjective, though. I've talked to as many people who like it, who don't.
On to the bigger topic of durability:
I'm about as concerned as about one of the belt slots breaking as I am concerned about an RCS phantom body breaking. I've seen those modular holster bodies crack about as frequently as I've seen the kydex belt loops crack. It's easy enough to say "that stuff breaks", but the fact of the matter is, kydex will break, period. All gear breaks, it will happen eventually; how long it lasts before that point is what concerns me. Considering the belt slots on this are made of joint molded .093" and .06" kydex sheets, I'm not terribly apprehensive about problems with long term durability. The belt slots won't be flexing as much as, say, the molded kydex clip on some types of AIWB holster (like Dale Fricke's stuff, for example), so in theory they should be lasting longer.
That said, I'm not terribly abusive with my gear; I'm an accountant, for ****s sake. I ride a desk most of the day and my usual mode of carry is IWB in a comp-tac MTAC (which I love). By way of example, I have had both my MTAC and my RCS phantom for ALONG TIME. I am still on the original clips/belt loops for both. This is a new production holster whose design and aesthetics intrigue me, so I want to give it a look, nothing more, nothing less. If it breaks in six months, well it was a $50 kydex holster, not a $150+ Alessi, Rosen, or Milt Sparks. I don't think I'll lose any sleep over it.
Let me tell you about the first rule of holes:
"When you find yourself in one, stop digging."
Bookmarks