Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 115

Thread: National Open Carry...What If...?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,478
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    National Open Carry...What If...?

    So what would actually happen if next Monday any law abiding citizen could legally, openly carry a firearm for any reason without need of a permit, license or stated reason for doing so?

    Not very long ago, depending upon how you view time, that was simply the way things were most places. And in a few, that is how it is now.

    As with virtually everything there is capacity for good and bad.

    Give some people money and they will buy drugs, gamble and engage in other various activities which will destroy their lives and that of others. Others will use money to pay bills, buy food and otherwise provide for themselves and those who depend upon them.

    Give some people freedom and they will use that freedom to attempt to restrict the freedoms of others or otherwise degrade the quality of life of their fellow citizens. Others will simply use those same freedoms to lead more productive, enjoyable lives.

    With virtually everything there will always be those who do bad things and can make even essentially good things like freedom and liberty come at a cost. That we allow the former to further restrict the latter as a result is simply one more additional cost that we endure because such people exist.

    Otherwise we could board airplanes with the .44 magnum we intend to use on our hunting trip in the carry on right next to the powerful narcotics we will be dropping off at our grandmothers house, which her doctor advised her to take, because drug prices happen to be cheaper in our state than hers. Sadly due to that former group of people, such a scenario now seems absurd.

    It is common exercise of people who oppose unrestricted carry to say "Imagine all of the bad, dangerous drivers on the road that you encounter every day...now imagine they all have guns." And while there is some merit to that analogy, my question is IF they are so dangerous...why do we let them keep their cars and let them drive? These people are far more likely to kill us in traffic and cars let them come into contact with far more people than a gun. One dumbass move on the interstate can kill and injure dozens of people. And a person can probably kill more people deliberately with a car than a gun, but please don't mention that on the national news...we have enough problems.

    So back to what if...what would actually happen.

    Well in a lot of places...nothing. Same thing that happened when we allowed greater carry freedoms with various permits or licenses. Some people create new problems because they have guns, other people prevent more problems because they have guns. It's the usual give and take and so far it seems the good far outweighs the bad. But legal carry in North Carolina may not produce the same result in Oakland, California.

    So what of Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, etc? What if?

    Well a few things would change. Criminals would STILL have the guns they have right now. And those criminals who have not YET been arrested could legally carry guns. The reality of course is if they are criminals (even if they haven't been arrested yet) and intent upon carrying a gun, they will do it regardless of laws because they are criminals. The difference is right now they don't do it openly so you have to check to see if they are actually armed.

    Really only two things are going to actually change. Violent "shoot em up" high crime areas will no longer be able to pretend they are anything else and the law abiding citizens who happen to live there will be forced to recognize those areas for what they actually are, and of course they will now have the freedom to arms themselves and shoot back according to local laws regarding personal defense.

    But for middle America, once the novelty has worn off, carrying a gun will be much like carrying a laptop computer, cell phone, your keys, wallet and all the other things you bring with you as needed. My dad used to bring a .45 on a pistol belt when he went camping for example.

    Some will point out that open carry makes you a target for criminals who will want your guns. This is of course true, but the same is true of the guns in your home. Criminals are also willing to target and kill you for your nice watch, car, cell phone, shoes, jacket, $10 in your pocket and a host of other things. Best to keep that in mind but you can probably save your life more effectively with the gun on your hip than the watch on your wrist. And honestly the average criminal can get a lot more from your Rolex or Omega than your Glock.

    Ideally, law abiding citizens would be free to conceal weapons as well as carry them openly so that one my custom tailor their perceived personal security needs to their environment. But it is already asking a LOT for everyone to legally strap on or sling a firearm, being able to hide it without proving yourself worthy is more freedom (and associated risk) than the citizens of most states are willing to consider. In many places they aren't even crazy about the people who have been cleared and licensed to do such things.

    So again, what would really happen?

    Bad places would be bad, and in places where decent, law abiding people outnumber the bad, pretty much nothing except for a few more guys creating problems and a larger number of people preventing most problems from happening.

    And with the bad places clearly recognized "perhaps" we could then focus solely on the bad people who MAKE those places bad to try and fix it. After all there is nothing specific about the architecture of Chicago that makes it dangerous and corrupt, and it isn't a result of the climate. A lot of it has to do with the good people who live there being powerless to prevent the bad people from doing the things they do.

    The problem of course is that we'd have to provide a huge number of people with a great deal of freedom and liberty.
    Last edited by SteyrAUG; 09-05-11 at 16:43.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    6,533
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    I'm guessing you copy and pasted this from some place like opencarry.org....

    Honestly, I would be against it. I support the ability to do it, but just because you CAN do something, does not mean you SHOULD do something.

    The overwhelming majority of open-carry activists I see are guys that are desperately in need of some good training, carrying all kinds of pos crap in some of the worst holsters I've seen; but are desperate for attention.

    I've got my nomex on, no worries.
    Employee of colonialshooting.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AZ-Waging jihad against crappy AR's.
    Posts
    24,902
    Feedback Score
    104 (100%)
    Open carry has its' time and place. Camping, hiking, etc... Otherwise it's silly. Not saying it shouldn't be allowed, but that it's not smart.

    I agree with Templar about many OCA. Everyone I have seen in AZ was a top shelf tool. One guy had a nylon holster and it was flopping all over with his pistol in it.

    Another guy weighed about 400 lbs. and was sporting some type of nylon drop leg holster. Again, it was bouncing all over and he couldn't even reach the pistol to draw it from standing position.



    Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/

    Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/

    M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141

    Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Virginia / Afghanistan
    Posts
    2,480
    Feedback Score
    54 (100%)
    I get the intent, but I think what you'd really have is Joe Q Public exposed to "That Guy", the mutton head we see at the public range sweeping the firing line with his Blackthorne AR, regaling us with his imaginary tales of SF badassery at the gun shop, or asking his friend to "houl mah beer an' watch dis, y'all".

    Perhaps I'm too cynical and jaded, or I've spent too much time on public ranges.
    Last edited by GermanSynergy; 09-05-11 at 18:26.
    SSG Jimmy Ide- KIA 28 Aug 10, Hyderabad, AFG

    1SG Blue Rowe- KIA 26 May 09, Panjshir, AFG.

    RIP Brothers

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA/Mount Pleasant, SC
    Posts
    358
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Ding ding ding ding ding! We have a winner!

    As you mentioned, at one point in time, the sight of a pistol on someone's hip caused as much of a stir as seeing a guy with a diamond stud in his ear.

    Oh, what a glorious day when those times come back...We can dream right?


    H
    "Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."-Thomas Paine

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    339
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Templar View Post
    I'm guessing you copy and pasted this from some place like opencarry.org....

    Honestly, I would be against it. I support the ability to do it, but just because you CAN do something, does not mean you SHOULD do something.

    The overwhelming majority of open-carry activists I see are guys that are desperately in need of some good training, carrying all kinds of pos crap in some of the worst holsters I've seen; but are desperate for attention.

    I've got my nomex on, no worries.
    That about sums it up. I've always been of the belief that open carry accomplishes one of two things.

    1) The person carrying deters a bad guy from doing something that bad guys are wont to do.

    2) Makes the person carrying the first person to be shot in the back of the head while standing in line at Subway by the bad guy who really needs to do that bad something in order to get the money he needs for his dope.

    I say, until you grow eyes in the back of your head, concealment provides more advantages in today's American society.

    IG, I agree totally about the OCA's in Arizona. I got called to a Smitty's one time because one of these doofs lost the mag out his 1911 in the aisles. I was there to collect it as found property when the guy showed up looking for it after retracing his steps. He'd been to Smitty's, Walmart and a car swap meet before someone tapped him on the shoulder and said: " 'scuse me, sir. Think you lost something." Did I mention he had been riding one of those courtesy electric shopping cart scooter thingys while shopping?
    Last edited by DireWulf; 09-05-11 at 18:31.
    Nothing man-portable is guaranteed to end a fight.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,866
    Feedback Score
    23 (100%)
    I respect people's right to open carry, but just stay away from me, and I'll keep my gun in my pants.

    I usually just keep my pistol tucked away when camping. That said I've been known to pack my SBR away when doing so as well (in my backpack).
    "There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die."

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,019
    Feedback Score
    0

    Thumbs down

    No offence intended but....
    Open carry is not much of an answer to anything -- except a gun-grabber's wet dream...


    I would suggest that we forget about national open carry until :

    1. All states have laws on the books that allow at least some citizens to obtain CCW permits or CCW like Vermont . One state to go . And of course , DC .
    Then....
    2. All states actually issue a meaningful number of permits . We have a ways to go , lots of votes to line up , many court victories to win , and a metric shitload of money to raise.
    Then...
    3. All states have an honest Shall Issue/ Objective Criteria system and fees that are no higher than a drivers' licence or a hunting licence. That will take some serious work .
    And :
    4. A national system that allows carry in adjacent states . For example Ohio people get to CCW in Michigan , Kentucky , PA , and Indiana with there Ohio license.

    Open carry is a wrong turn down a dead end street and a waste of resources until those things are done . IMO , some misguided groups and individuals are like Hitler in the bunker - defend everything everywhere , attack everything everywhere , anyone who thinks otherwise is a traitor --- yadda , yadda , blah , blah , blah , blah.

    www.saf.org
    www.nra.com

    WE Are Winning .

    YMMV.
    "... in common use at the time... for all lawful purposes... "

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    501
    Feedback Score
    0
    I am all for concealed carry. Why let someone know you are armed when you can have the element of surprise and other wise blend in with the rest of the sheeple when you are truly a wolf.
    There are isolated instances where i think a person might think twice about attacking an armed person but the truth is that just gives the attacker the opportunity to used deadly force to get what they want rather than implying that they would used deadly force.

    If you are going to carry do it concealed. As a LEO it makes me uneasy to see someone whether a slap dick or aj squared away carrying a weapon on their hip not next to a badge.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    25,478
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Templar View Post
    I'm guessing you copy and pasted this from some place like opencarry.org....
    All original thoughts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Templar View Post
    Honestly, I would be against it. I support the ability to do it, but just because you CAN do something, does not mean you SHOULD do something.

    The overwhelming majority of open-carry activists I see are guys that are desperately in need of some good training, carrying all kinds of pos crap in some of the worst holsters I've seen; but are desperate for attention.

    I've got my nomex on, no worries.
    So when my father strapped on a 1911 to go camping years ago, what was wrong about that?
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •