Outfit a Colt 6920??

[markm]

It has been my experience that Black Hills remanufactured ammo is fully the equal or better than most makers new ammo. This includes Remington, Winchester and Federal.

I've fired some of the BH blue box. The components are good... (powder and bullet)

The ammo I bought, however, didn't have the casenecks trimmed into spec. I posted this on TOS a while back and one of the members over there with a brain confirmed this on the ammo he had.

Apparently it's not an issue..... judging by the gobbs of rounds shot up without complaint.

[jackinfl]

[QUOTE=C4IGrant;93819]For those that have never seen a C3, here is a pic of it with the Aimpoint see-thru covers.

Looks pretty "low speed" doesn't it.




C4



HOLY C$#@,
That looks just like my low speed high drag M3. How much would i of saved?.....

[Colt6920]

Can't never have enough Colt 6920's??????

[Nathan_Bell]

[QUOTE=jackinfl;93828]

For those that have never seen a C3, here is a pic of it with the Aimpoint see-thru covers.

Looks pretty "low speed" doesn't it.




C4



HOLY C$#@,
That looks just like my low speed high drag M3. How much would i of saved?.....

Enough to buy a good mount and a lifetime worth of batteries (assuming you only live another 40 years )

[scottryan]

Are you punching out of a sub at 60ft? No your not. Will the C3 survive a river crossing? Sure will.

So just to make sure you understand, the C3 is 100% waterproof. Your just not going to be able to dive with it.

Show me one example if where someone sold their C3 and did not get a fair price. If people are figuring in "re-sale value" into their decision making process then they need to stay on the airsoft forums.

People want the M series for the following reasons:

1. Don't know that the C3 exists.
2. Want to look cool and impress their friends.
3. Believe that the C3 is not waterproof.
4. Believe that the C3 is not rugged.
5. Are afraid that the cool kids on TOS won't be impressed with their kit.


C4

You are so quick to tell me I'm wrong when I have a valid point.

Whether a specific user is going to dive down to 100 ft is irrelevant. The Comp C is not as submersible as the Comp M. That is 100% fact. Thus the Comp M is more rugged. You can't spin it any other way.

A scope that is more submersible is better sealed. This usually translates to heavier duty parts.

I never said the Comp C is not appropriate for most users as far as functionality.

As far as resale value, what if the user wants to get rid of their optic when a better version comes out? What does this have to do with being a poser or impressing people? Nothing.

[C4IGrant]

[QUOTE=jackinfl;93828]

For those that have never seen a C3, here is a pic of it with the Aimpoint see-thru covers.

Looks pretty "low speed" doesn't it.




C4



HOLY C$#@,
That looks just like my low speed high drag M3. How much would i of saved?.....

A lot. If you needed NV though, the C3 wouldn't work out.


C4

[rob_s]

You are so quick to tell me I'm wrong when I have a valid point.

Whether a specific user is going to dive down to 100 ft is irrelevant. The Comp C is not as submersible as the Comp M. That is 100% fact. Thus the Comp M is more rugged. You can't spin it any other way.

A scope that is more submersible is better sealed. This usually translates to heavier duty parts.

I never said the Comp C is not appropriate for most users as far as functionality.

As far as resale value, what if the user wants to get rid of their optic when a better version comes out? What does this have to do with being a poser or impressing people? Nothing.

All of which ignores the OP's question about how to outfit HIS 6920.

[C4IGrant]

You are so quick to tell me I'm wrong when I have a valid point.

Whether a specific user is going to dive down to 100 ft is irrelevant. The Comp C is not as submersible as the Comp M. That is 100% fact. Thus the Comp M is more rugged. You can't spin it any other way.

A scope that is more submersible is better sealed. This usually translates to heavier duty parts.

I never said the Comp C is not appropriate for most users as far as functionality.

As far as resale value, what if the user wants to get rid of their optic when a better version comes out? What does this have to do with being a poser or impressing people? Nothing.

I think too many times, people that are NEVER going to use a piece of gear like a SEAL is, get caught up in specs. The C3 may not go down as deep as the M series, but no Civy or LE shooter is ever going to miss it. So again, why pay for something that your not going to use? Its kind of like the guys that buy the NV compatible Aimpoints and will never own a NV device. Makes no sense.

I hate to be the one to tell you this, but your the ONLY ONE that believes you have a valid point here.

According to Aimpoint, the parts are all the same. So you do not get better "parts" in a M series.

I have never seen anyone not be able to sell the C3 (for a fair price) because it is not a "M" series.

People get wrapped around the axle when it comes to having to have the Mil-Standard just because they see some guy in IZ with it on his weapon. The C3 will do everything the same as a ML3 (less pop out of a sub) for a lot less money. This is a simple fact.



C4

[C4IGrant]

Another pic of the C3 and what it comes with.



C4

[ST911]

It has been my experience that Black Hills remanufactured ammo is fully the equal or better than most makers new ammo. This includes Remington, Winchester and Federal.

My experience as well.

Substantially better than those, in fact, as they refuse to compromise their QC for the sake of increased production.