Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: CA - Brown bans OC and passes long-gun registration.

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Quote Originally Posted by pilotguyo540 View Post
    While I believe you Belmont, I am failing to understand how it can not apply to the states. It would seem useless to have the bill of rights if you state could consider it, or sections thereof, invalid. When states pass laws, these can be challanged on constitutional grounds going all the way to SCOTUS. I am failing to understand just how the constitution works on a stste by state level.


    Yes the BOR was limitations on the Federal government not the states.


    It wasn't until the 14th Amendment was passed that the states were bound by the BOR.


    SCOTUS basically overuled the 14th Amendment, and then later courts have had to incorporate sections of each amendment to the states as cases presented themselves.


    McDonald vs. Chicago is the case that incorporated the 2nd Amendment to the states.



    Read these: http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_bor.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorpo...Bill_of_Rights

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_..._v._Cruikshank

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Puyallup, WA
    Posts
    963
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PRGGodfather View Post
    Multiple Pro-2A entities are poised for the barrage of lawsuits, even though this battle should have been fought in the 1960's when the Black Panthers marched with slung M1 Carbines on Sacramento. Unspoken racism fueled fear of firearms, and this continues today.
    Yes... and many other states adopted laws to deal with situations like that without flatly outlawing open carry of a loaded firearm.

    Washington has one like this. I have heard this talked about as a vague racist law that talks around what it was actually intended to prevent (angry black guys in public places with guns). It became law in 1969.

    "RCW 9.41.270
    Weapons apparently capable of producing bodily harm — Unlawful carrying or handling — Penalty — Exceptions.

    (1) It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons..."

    Bold emphasis mine. Note Washington still allows open carry of a loaded firearm as long as it is not "in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons."

    So in the 60s America was afraid of black people in public with guns. Now we are afraid of everyone in public with guns. How egalitarian of us. Look at the Progress we have made.

    Last edited by BrianS; 10-12-11 at 16:08.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    out west
    Posts
    700
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Belmont31R View Post
    Yes the BOR was limitations on the Federal government not the states.


    It wasn't until the 14th Amendment was passed that the states were bound by the BOR.


    SCOTUS basically overuled the 14th Amendment, and then later courts have had to incorporate sections of each amendment to the states as cases presented themselves.


    McDonald vs. Chicago is the case that incorporated the 2nd Amendment to the states.



    Read these: http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_bor.html

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorpo...Bill_of_Rights

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_..._v._Cruikshank
    You are a gentlemen and a scholar.

    I am going to take a nap now.
    "Oh, its a wonderful day! My sun is shining, my birds are chirping, my humongous chicken defeated Elmo." Huxley

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Also trying to ban people from putting pacifiers in their mouth and wearing gloves with lights on them....




    (Video has some scantily clad females so maybe NSFW) http://youtu.be/hm3qQyWXoe0




    Notice how dumb the "lawmaker" admits to being. She says she didn't even know what she was trying to legislate, and didn't know you can't ban a certain type of music. 'Oh we found it was uh um unconstitutional to ban a type of music and oh um........'.


    I wonder what she would say about these laws that just got signed in. Probably equally as stupid and unaware of what they're constitutionally allowed to regulate.
    Last edited by Belmont31R; 10-13-11 at 13:41.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    4,167
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by J8127 View Post
    Reading the Stars and Stripes today a CA lawmaker was quoted as saying "Now our citizens won't have to worry about their children being shot by some crazy gun-toting vigilante"

    Makes my ****ing blood boil.
    http://news.yahoo.com/8-killed-south...234451134.html

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •