Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Glock 22 Gen 3 or Gen 4 is the question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    406
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Glock 22 Gen 3 or Gen 4 is the question

    So I have been shooting Glock's since they first came out and have owned Gen 1-3 in 9mm, 40 and 45acp. I currently have all Gen 3 9mm in 17's and 26's. In the past I have had a lot of 40's in 22 and 27 and never had any issues.

    I bought a new Glock 22 Gen 3 yesterday and pick it up Sunday afternoon. My question is should I keep the new Gen 3 I bought or swap it out for a Gen 4 G22? I plan on keeping all my 9mm in Gen 3 but since this is a 40cal I have mixed feelings on what I have been reading. In 40 cal is the Gen 3 or Gen 4 better?

    Your comments please.

    Thanks,
    David

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,905
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by dtibbals View Post
    So I have been shooting Glock's since they first came out and have owned Gen 1-3 in 9mm, 40 and 45acp. I currently have all Gen 3 9mm in 17's and 26's. In the past I have had a lot of 40's in 22 and 27 and never had any issues.

    I bought a new Glock 22 Gen 3 yesterday and pick it up Sunday afternoon. My question is should I keep the new Gen 3 I bought or swap it out for a Gen 4 G22? I plan on keeping all my 9mm in Gen 3 but since this is a 40cal I have mixed feelings on what I have been reading. In 40 cal is the Gen 3 or Gen 4 better?

    Your comments please.

    Thanks,
    David
    Never shot the Gen 4 40 but my friends who T&E them for the Alaska State Troopers love them and said recoil was noticably less. I would give it a try over the Gen 3. I also tried a gen 4 Glock 17 and plan on getting one myself.
    Pat
    Serving as a LEO since 1999.
    USPSA# A56876 A Class
    Firearms Instructor
    Armorer for AR15, 1911, Glocks and Remington 870 shotguns.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    406
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Alaskapopo View Post
    Never shot the Gen 4 40 but my friends who T&E them for the Alaska State Troopers love them and said recoil was noticably less. I would give it a try over the Gen 3. I also tried a gen 4 Glock 17 and plan on getting one myself.
    Pat
    Do you know if the Gen 3 and Gen 4 use the same magazine?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,905
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by dtibbals View Post
    Do you know if the Gen 3 and Gen 4 use the same magazine?
    Gen 4 can use all mags but you just can't flip the magazine release around for left hand use with older mags.
    Pat
    Serving as a LEO since 1999.
    USPSA# A56876 A Class
    Firearms Instructor
    Armorer for AR15, 1911, Glocks and Remington 870 shotguns.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    910
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I have had my Gen 4 Glock 22 for about a year. I have about 900 rds. through it. No malfunctions. It's accurate and I like the features and stuff on the Gen 4, but I wouldn't swap it out your Gen 3 for a Gen 4 unless you really didn't like the Gen 3 for some odd reason. Besides, it's a great excuse to buy another pistol in a few months!!!
    Have Fun, Be Safe

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Loxahatchee, Fl
    Posts
    196
    Feedback Score
    0
    In .40 cal I have the gen 4 27 &23 and both have been flawless. My 9mm's are gen 3 with the exeception of a gen 4 26. The only Glock I ever had issues with was a G30 sf. I think the .40 cal. Glocks are good to go.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,922
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Remember,

    They broke the 9s trying to fix the 40s.

    Hopefully, they did actually properly test the changes to the 40 since they(the 40s) were the whole reason for this exercise. The 9s got the changes for logistical reasons I suspect. Trying to minimize the number of different assemblies and parts on-hand.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    246
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have fired both generations of Glock extensively in 9mm and 40 S&W.

    I think the Gen4 has the potential to become a better 40 S&W platform than the Gen3.

    I would expect the new spring configuration to produce a longer service life, and the Gen4 40 S&W's I have fired work well with rail mounted lights. Glock has issued a recoil spring recall/exchange, and has supposedly designed new EJECTORS for the Gen 4 guns. Some agencies/owners were reporting erratic ejection, and the word is that Glock is replacing ejectors on some people's Gen4 (9 and 40) guns.

    I personally did notice a difference in recoil in the Gen4 40's. The Gen 3 guns seemed to "bottom out" due to the 9mm hand-me-down recoil spring. The heavier dual spring in the Gen4 feels a little smoother and doesn't have the same "snappy" feeling of the slide ramming something solid. This change may enhance the longevity of the pistol, despite the fact that even the Gen3 Glocks 40's were exceptionally durable.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    246
    Feedback Score
    0
    I would only switch if the rail light reliability is a deal breaker for you, or if you find the recoil to be super "snappy."

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    406
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    UPDATE

    Well I went in and picked up my pistol today. I ended up going with the Glock 22 Gen 4. It was a tough call after reading all the issues. I spoke to a friend on Sunday who is a LEO and is now issued a Gen 4 22 and has had zero issues over the last year. He also has a light mounted on it at all times.

    So I took a gamble on it. I purchased 300 rounds of Federal 180 grain brass case and 500 rounds of Winchester Ranger 180 bonded JHP. I shot all the Federal and 100 of the Ranger and it ran 100%. We tried it upside down and every angle you can imagine and it ran 100%. Took it out of the box and shot it, didn't do anything to the pistol including no lube. I shot it with 2 fingers and again was 100%. We shot at pieces of clay targets at 30 yards and had no issues having one shot hits. We also shot at tall weeds and did split a few like a weed-wacker. The pistol is not only reliable but crazy accurate! This is probably the 40th+ Glock I have owned over my lifetime and now is one of 5 I currently own. Very happy with it so far, I don't foresee any issues with the pistol going forward.

    On a side note the Serial number is a RYH prefix and date of manufacture is 8/19/11. I would hope this is the most current production with any changes already incorporated into the pistol.

    David
    Last edited by dtibbals; 10-04-11 at 11:51.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •