|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A lot of good points made in that video. Certainly the arrow fired by the founding fathers has missed it's mark with our current government. Sadly though, I can't think of any other nation in the world that offers better.
The one question I have is about his reference to the Civil War. I have heard this mentioned before by others, that it was little more than a Federal power grab. But one of the few real jobs of a federal government is protecting the rights of the citizens, and when half the nation is denying those rights to a large percentage of its people, what else is the federal government to do?
Could someone please help me understand this line of thought?![]()
“The ruling class doesn’t care about public safety. Having made it very difficult for States and localities to police themselves, having left ordinary citizens with no choice but to protect themselves as best they can, they now try to take our guns away. In fact they blame us and our guns for crime. This is so wrong that it cannot be an honest mistake.” – former U.S. Sen. Malcolm Wallop (R-Wy.)
I haven't watched the video yet (I will tonight) but thought I'd offer my opinion on the post about the Civil War.
Most people think that the war was over slavery but that is not the case. Lincoln didn't care about slavery (he may have personally but it was not the reason for the war)-
http://showcase.netins.net/web/creat...es/greeley.htmMy paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union.
The war was over preserving the union and not allowing states to leave it. IF the war had actually been about ending slavery then it would be a different story. As it stands though, it was nothing more than the federal government expanding its authority.
Last edited by RancidSumo; 10-04-11 at 13:32.
Tu ne cede malis
http://mises.org
"Cheer up Jim. Thank God we don’t get as much government as we pay for!"
-Charles Kettering
It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.
Chuck, we miss ya man.
كافر
If suffering in silence from multiple injustices is the mark of manhood in a cohesive society, these people would be a lot happier in Japan.
"Life is short, but the years are long." - Robert A. Heinlein
If Judge Napolitano ever ran for office he would have my vote.
Big +1
"Life is short, but the years are long." - Robert A. Heinlein
That guy was...
1. Apparently very poor at paperwork
2. A dumbass
3. P.O.S.
The world is a better place.
If you become unemployed you can contact your domestic relations office and they will work with your on child support payments.
Of course maybe he couldve had custody if he hadnt beat his daughter.
Last edited by J-Dub; 10-05-11 at 14:17.
Pretty harsh judgement without knowing all the facts. This guy is far from alone and some estimates state that as much as 18,000 men commit suicide a year due to similar circumstances involving divorce and child support. Smacking a child doesn't constitute beating in any sense of the word.
Bookmarks