Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Best Leupold for 18" SPR(style) build?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    sgtlmj and Gunfighter13 have given some great advice above. With Leupold optics, the MR/T line of scopes is a better "fit" with AR15 rifles than the LR. Illuminated reticles are an advantage for a rifle intended for other than range use... There are some reasons why the original SPR's Leup 3.5-10x LR/T was replaced with the 3-9x TS30A2 MR/T scope when the Mk12 was type classified... For a mid-range 50-500 yd or so type rifle, the 2.5-8x MR/T with M2 turrets is another good option in the Leupold line of scopes.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    That NF is very fine optic for this type of rifle!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    463
    Feedback Score
    0
    "Lit reticles are necessary for varied lighting conditions. Pull up on something really dark with a little backlight and the reticle will wash right out. We never know which side of the meth bug's trailer we'll be setting up on, or if he has a yard light. The lit reticle is good insurance." sgtlmj

    That is a point I hadn't considered and I agree it would be good insurance.

    What my experience has been for hunting is I can see my crosshairs and the animal well after legal shooting time. When using a spotlight with a red lense for coyote hunting, it doesn't take much light as we use the halo, the crosshairs are plain as day. But if they started shining back at us I think I can see your point.
    I've used an eo-tech and found it needed to be turned down low to prevent the target from washing out. But again I can see "insurance" for all conditions. Thank you.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,932
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    The leupold mark 4 mrt 3-9x36 if you want to keep it authentic

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    266
    Feedback Score
    0
    I still can't believe they discontinued the MR/T 3-9!



    Leupold 3-9 MR/T M3 TMR ILL


  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    A-stan or MI or _________
    Posts
    3,652
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Alright, thanks guys for the great advice.

    Sounds like 2.5-8X Illum. would be a good choice for me.

    Now can someone explain which target knobs would be the best (M1,M2,M3) for an AR(SPR) platform and why?
    Praise be to the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1

    Owner of MI-TAC, LLC .

    @MichiganTactical

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    215
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave L. View Post
    Alright, thanks guys for the great advice.

    Sounds like 2.5-8X Illum. would be a good choice for me.

    Now can someone explain which target knobs would be the best (M1,M2,M3) for an AR(SPR) platform and why?
    The M1 has 1/4 MOA adjustment and the M2 has 1/2 MOA adjustment.
    The M1 will give you a finer adjustment but you have to go twice as many clicks as the M2. I perfer the 1/4 MOA adjustment.


    There are only three types: Trained, Un-trained or JAFO.
    Which one are you?


  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    47
    Feedback Score
    0
    Is parallax adjustment available on 2.5-8?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,932
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Anyone have any experience with the NF 2.5-10x24mm NXS?

    How do you like the optic?
    What reticle do you have?
    Do you like it better than the mark 4?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Morgan County, Utah
    Posts
    221
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gunfighter13 View Post
    The M1 has 1/4 MOA adjustment and the M2 has 1/2 MOA adjustment.
    The M1 will give you a finer adjustment but you have to go twice as many clicks as the M2. I perfer the 1/4 MOA adjustment.
    I also prefer the finer adjustment. Not necessarily for the elevation, but definitely for the windage adjustment. I shoot critters and not people, so a finer adjustment is more important to me.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •