Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: My first attempt at gel testing, could use some constructive critisism

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    235
    Feedback Score
    0

    My first attempt at gel testing, could use some constructive critisism

    Well I have finally conducted my first gel test. I shot an 87gr HotCore from a .25-223 with a 16" barrel going 2723fps at impact into a 6"x6"x12" block. It was supposed to be longer but I the cardboard mold bowed at the center and shortened the block significantly. In the future, I'll be making my own mold so I can control the dimentions better.

    Anyway, the first thing I learned is that a 6"x6" block is not big enough for rifle bullets. It didn't help that I failed to hit the perfect center of the block (didn't compensate perfectly for the close range) but I also think the max crack diameter for this round would have exceeded 6". As it stands, I don't know because the crack extended beyond the edge of the gel block. I used the 6x6 block because gelatin innovations sent me the 6x6 kit accidentally and told me to keep it so I figured I would try that one first so if I royally screwed up I wasn't really out anything. Here's what I found:

    Neck Length = 0"
    Max Cavity = 5 1/8"+
    Length of Cavity = 12"+
    Penetration = 12"+
    BB @ 650fps penetrated 4 1/8"
    (Most say + because the crack blew out the side of the block, as you'll see in the photos below)

    The bullet fragmented and you can see frag along nearly the entire cavity. I caught the bullet after it fully penetrated the block using water filled jugs (I was hoping it would penetrate more than 12" so I anticipated this with the short block) and it had a separated jacket and core. That said, the jacket and core, as well as a lot of frag, ended up in the jug.

    Overall, I have to say I'm impressed with this wildcat and load. I'm still new to gel testing, so perhaps I'm misinterpreting the results but it had zero neck length, the cracks (temp cavity) extended the entire length of the 12" block, and it penetrated more than the 12" minimum standard. This all looks pretty good to my relatively untrained eyes.

    Finally, here are the photos:

    Right Side


    Top


    Bullet


    Frag still stuck in jug (it was still wet and they wouldn't pour out)
    Advanced techniques are the basics mastered.

    Excellence is an art won by training and habit. We are what we repeatedly do. -- Aristotle

    Pistol/Shotgun/Rifle Instructor
    Sig/Remington/RRA/Sabre Armorer

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    Glad to see folks testing stuff on their own.

    First off, don't make molds. We use large Rubbermaid 66 liter storage boxes or similar containers you can find at Target, Wal-Mart, etc... Just pour the liquid gelatin into the bin; there is no need to spray with mold release or aerosolized cooking oil. Remember, it is important for the blocks to cool a MINIMUM of 72 hours prior to use. Our block size is approximately 16” x 20 “ x 6-12”(height is variable depending how much gelatin we pour into the bin) we usually prepare block weights from 40 to 80 lbs depending on caliber being tested. The 6x6x18 blocks are really best for pistol shots. We calibrate the gel blocks using a Crossman "Pumpmaster 760" air rifle to fire a standard .177 inch BB into the blocks. Both velocity and penetration are recorded. At a velocity of 590 f/s +/- 15 f/s, an ideal range of penetration is defined as 8.5 cm +/- 1.0 cm of penetration, although up to +/- 1.5 cm is considered acceptable if you want to use more relaxed guidelines.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    235
    Feedback Score
    0
    Dr Roberts, I went back and sectioned the bock at approximately 2.5" intervals giving me 5 slices. I then measured the cracks at true length instead of estimating by looking through the side of the block. Here's what I got for actual measurements:

    0" - 4 3/16"
    2.5" - 5 1/4"
    5.0" - 5 5/8"
    7.5" - 4 1/4"
    10.0" - 2 7/8"
    12.5" - 2 1/4"

    My initial measurements in the first post were from holding a tape measure up to the side of the block, which of course didn't measure the largest actual crack diameter. That didn't account for the hypotenuse, just 1 side of the triangle and an estimate at that.

    Which measurement is the correct one to report? I want to make sure I'm posting accurate information. If the numbers I got after cutting the block are correct, this round may have some promise.

    Here's a pic of the sections:
    Advanced techniques are the basics mastered.

    Excellence is an art won by training and habit. We are what we repeatedly do. -- Aristotle

    Pistol/Shotgun/Rifle Instructor
    Sig/Remington/RRA/Sabre Armorer

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    The one at 2.5" is probably closest to the actual max TC, however since your block was so small, the actual stretch may not be correctly derived. Keep in mind that there is a standardized methodology associated with crack measurements.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    235
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
    The one at 2.5" is probably closest to the actual max TC, however since your block was so small, the actual stretch may not be correctly derived. Keep in mind that there is a standardized methodology associated with crack measurements.
    Where can I find the methodology? I can't seem to find it in the FBI information I got from Agent Boone.
    Advanced techniques are the basics mastered.

    Excellence is an art won by training and habit. We are what we repeatedly do. -- Aristotle

    Pistol/Shotgun/Rifle Instructor
    Sig/Remington/RRA/Sabre Armorer

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    It is not FBI, but JSWB-IPT. You might try starting here: http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2004arms/session9/minisi.ppt.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    235
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thank you for the info sir.
    Advanced techniques are the basics mastered.

    Excellence is an art won by training and habit. We are what we repeatedly do. -- Aristotle

    Pistol/Shotgun/Rifle Instructor
    Sig/Remington/RRA/Sabre Armorer

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    276
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Gel testing

    Does the gel need to set under vaccum? Would the inclusion of air bubbles skew the results?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    235
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by drrufo View Post
    Does the gel need to set under vaccum? Would the inclusion of air bubbles skew the results?
    It does not set under vacuum. I think air bubbles would skew the results but the mix is very thin when you pour it. I had no problem with air bubbles in the block.

    They do provide a defoamer with the kit which I believe combats that specific issue.
    Advanced techniques are the basics mastered.

    Excellence is an art won by training and habit. We are what we repeatedly do. -- Aristotle

    Pistol/Shotgun/Rifle Instructor
    Sig/Remington/RRA/Sabre Armorer

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    169
    Feedback Score
    0
    Good job, Altair. You probably realize now why more people don't do this: It gets EXPENSIVE for the amount of gel needed to capture rifle shots.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •