Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Stand Alone or Over Armor LBV's

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NoVa
    Posts
    2,906
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave L. View Post
    Hey now, not all mil. units are "forced to wear" an Interceptor
    True but by his comments, and loc, he is not in a .soc position...
    Kevin S. Boland
    Manager, Federal Sales
    FN America, LLC
    Office: 703.288.3500 x181 | Mobile: 407-451-4544 | Fax: 703.288.4505
    www.fnhusa.com

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,328
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Jack-

    I am not a fan of the Interceptor, and not really all that big on the CIRAS either. There are better solutions, but since that is not your question, no need to waste time on it.

    I prefer to have my pouches directly attached to my armor. Several reasons why-
    No gear-shift
    Lower profile
    Faster jock-ups
    Faster doffing
    Simplicity
    Less heat (negligable effect though)

    The only reason I would go with a plate carrier over armor is if my armor did not accomodate my plates, or if I was in a role that precluded my use of overt armor, with a rig setup as a contingency plan.

    Be sure that your plates are stand-alone if you intend on only wearing a plate carrier at times.

    YMMV
    Jack Leuba
    Director of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •