Accidental post.
Accidental post.
Last edited by HaydenB; 11-05-11 at 20:33.
"The secret to happiness is freedom, and the secret to freedom is courage." - Thucydides, c. 410 BC
Not really. Look at my comment directly below the ones you quoted.
I think balance is best most applications.
For example I think for the most part if your going to have 14lb rifle, with a 20" SS barrel, and a 15x optic, you may as well have a bolt gun.
At the same time I think a 7.62x51 SBR is a little counter productive.
As far as SBR's and 7.62, I'm thinking of cutting the SCAR to 13". From the two people I now that have done this then ran them through classes, they've become MORE accurate. If I can have a 7.62 that's extremely maneuverable and accurate that is still very effective on larger game at the distances I typically find myself shooting, I think it's a great choice.
I have plenty of rifles, including some of the big ones, and the SCAR H (or similar type of rifle) does everything I need and more.
Proven combat techniques may not be flashy and may require a bit more physical effort on the part of the shooter. Further, they may not win competition matches, but they will help ensure your survival in a shooting or gunfight on the street. ~ Paul Howe
I'd be interested as well. This rifle is a solid performer and very manageable. I don't run my 7.62's to the extent that I do my ARs though so I can't speculate how it would handle abuse. I have a SCAR Light as well that's been great but I don't run it that often.
I know hootiewho and Stephen from Blue Force Gear have many thousands of rounds through there's and a number of classes, but that's a different situation as well. The only issue I've even heard of so far is Stephen's screws came loose (or weren't ever installed possibly) in the stock body and it came off, if I remember correctly.
For my use which is mostly at the ranch for a few days at a time and a full 3 or 4 days of constant shooting and hunting, it works extremely well.
Proven combat techniques may not be flashy and may require a bit more physical effort on the part of the shooter. Further, they may not win competition matches, but they will help ensure your survival in a shooting or gunfight on the street. ~ Paul Howe
I will try to dig up the threads here at M4C, but from my understanding the long term durability reports on the Mk.17 are mixed. I have seen posts from reputable sources which indicate there could be some problems with the Mk.17, but I have also seen posts from reputable sources indicating it is doing quite well.
In all honesty if I were still in and found myself on my way to some 3rd world shit-hole tomorrow I would want a Mk.17 with some sort of good medium range magnified optic on it. That is assuming of course that the weapon system worked as advertised for the entire 12 months.
Last edited by decodeddiesel; 11-05-11 at 23:16.
For sure you should see an accuracy improvement because your making a thin barrel more rigid. I was just referring to the gas getting burnt in the air. But then again, I've never shot one, so I don't know how bad the blast is.
13" isn't so bad. I was more referring to <12" 762x51 SBRs. At which point is kinda like a 7.5" 5.56 AR to me.
Sorry, I misunderstood that one. I don't think I'd want anything less than a 13" in 7.62. From what I understand, as I haven't spent any time on a short barreled SCAR H, it seems to be a sweet spot for accuracy, shoot ability and maneuverability and I've not heard any complaints about the blast on the 13"...but that means nothing. My guess is with a flash hider on a 13" it would be more tolerable than a 16" with a brake. Once my Surefire 212 comes in, I'll start the process for the new Surefire 7.62 mini and on the SCAR H as well.
Proven combat techniques may not be flashy and may require a bit more physical effort on the part of the shooter. Further, they may not win competition matches, but they will help ensure your survival in a shooting or gunfight on the street. ~ Paul Howe
Bookmarks