Unfortunately, I had to shoot a dog that attacked my wife two days ago. This thread is not about the merits of dog shooting but the performance of the ammunition.
The gun was a Glock 19, and the dog was approximately 50#. The first two shots were fired as a hammer, from above into the dog's back at a range of about two feet, and the third was fired transversely through the brain when the dog failed to release its grip on my wife's leg.
The first two bullets remained inside the dog and were not recovered. The third bullet completely penetrated and exited the skull, leaving a dent in the tile floor. There was a complete core separation, leaving the jacket lying on the floor next to the dent, and the core was recovered lying on a desk approximately six feet away (apparently it bounced off the floor with just enough energy remaining to loft it over to the desk).
The dog was more or less DRT after the first two shots, but when he refused to relinquish his grip I decided a head shot was indicated. He still had to be pried off my wife's leg even after the brain was destroyed.
I'm a little curious/concerned that the first two rounds did not exit. I didn't take measurements, but a 50# dog is not THAT thick in its vertical aspect. It would be interesting to know if those rounds experienced core separation as well.
I'm now considering the 147gr Ranger, and perhaps the new bonded 127gr +P+ Ranger as well. I think I'd like a little more penetration than what I got.
Opinions, Doc?
Wife is ok, btw. Broken toes and puncture wounds, but ok.


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks